Guest posts by BloodAngel

13

Crucible Archive / Re: Dark Ranger | Dark Ranger

« on: February 13, 2011, 06:45:17 pm »

How about this?

Absorbs one quanta every turn to maintain shadow? dunno how to reword it tho

14

Forum Game Archive / Re: Composite Deck

« on: February 11, 2011, 08:03:58 am »

Adding another Quantum tower, we're running a tad short

Code: [Select]

6u5 7k2 7t4 7t4 74f 7t5 748 7t6 6rn 6qq 7th 6qq 7t6 6u3 7t5 6qq 7do 6ve 6ve 80j 6qq

15

Forum Game Archive / Re: Composite Deck

« on: February 10, 2011, 09:50:06 pm »

guessing we need a tower to suply the dark quanta 

Code: [Select]

7t4 7t5

16

Anvil Archive / Re: Dark Kraken | Dark Kraken

« on: February 10, 2011, 09:29:46 am »

Awesome idea!!
I really like the synergy with flooding, gives it finally some more use,
also, i think the cost of 5 is enough, if you use this as a hitter, Abyss crawler is better 6|6 for 4
And since the ability can only be used if you have 7 or more creatures out, then play the Kraken and flood him, i don't think you have to calculate that through in the costs.

Based on my own superduperknowlegde of cards, flooding is absorbing a water quanta as well, so the cost for the ability would be 2 respectively, + a one time cost of  2 (inunduation) and the kraken cost (5), so it seems right to me.

17

Forum Game Archive / Re: Composite Deck

« on: February 09, 2011, 02:50:46 pm »

Another Blightning for the cremation.

Code: [Select]

7dm 7dm 7dp 7dp 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7n6 808 808 808 808 808 808 80c 80i 80e 7oe 7oe 7oe 80j 80i 809 809

18

Anvil Archive / Re: Magnet | Lodestone

« on: February 09, 2011, 02:41:13 pm »

Then im good with it, else it would be broken indeed!

19

Anvil Archive / Re: Magnet | Lodestone

« on: February 08, 2011, 10:09:21 pm »

I might've looked over it, since i'm kinda tired,
but if you PA this Lodestone, doens't it means that all of you permanents are protected/indestructable?

20

Crucible Archive / Re: Shard | Shard of Meekness

« on: February 08, 2011, 03:25:57 pm »

Reduces by half
i.e. Lava golem 11/6 becomes 5/6 and still has growth but the effect of
growth will become +1/+1 form a long as a Shard of Meekness remains
in play.
(Round down.Effect does
not stack.)
If there is no Shard of Meekness in play the effect ends and all attack
values return to normal.

The growth effect should be +1|+2 right? because only the attack halves?

Anyway, neat idea, wonder how this will pack out.

21

Elidnis / Re: Oracle : Elidnis

« on: February 07, 2011, 10:30:40 pm »

For the second deck in the first post, shouldn't that have a fahrenheit in it?

wouldn't really work, since Elidnis is outhealing that damage anyways.

22

Card Art / Re: Card border competition submission

« on: February 06, 2011, 07:44:33 pm »

in my opinion, the yellow/orange/whatever colour of the border is something i do not like.
The rest is looking really good!

23

Crucible Archive / Re: Raptor | Velociraptor

« on: February 06, 2011, 02:50:11 pm »

Okay, interesting idea, i like it!

I do have a few points to put out:
- I think you might lower the satiate cost to  ;   respectively
and
- A question. If you play this in your first turn, like 3  towers and a raptor, meaning it has nothing to consume, doens't that mean its a 'dead' card?

'dead' as in useless because it eats itself before its attacks?

24

Anvil Archive / Re: Will-o'-the-Wisp | Will-o'-the-Night

« on: January 30, 2011, 02:13:59 pm »

I also really like the mechanic, and i agree on the fact that it should keep 0 attack, making it immortal to shields, perhaps its an idea to make it a 0|4? thus harder to kill.

It's not that I don't know or don't have a vague idea, but please tell us what a "Will-o'the-wisp" is and what its relation to its suggested ability is.

I do remember that will-o-wisp is a non damaging attack at pokemon, it just burns the target (thus it fits the theme of a non 'direct'damaging card and it would benefit the extra defence (as i proposed) more than some extra attack.

but to look it up for you, wikipedia says this:
'A will-o'-the-wisp or ignis fatuus (Latin, from ignis, "fire" + fatuus, "foolish")—also called will-o'-wisp, corpse candle, and is the folklore term for a ghostly light sometimes seen at night or twilight over bogs, swamps, and marshes. It resembles a flickering lamp and is sometimes said to recede if approached. Much traditional, non-scientific belief surrounds the phenomenon.'

thus it makes sense with the pokemon attack, burns (iginis means fire) and i like the idea that you implented.
Reducing/burning the HP of the opponent whenever he/she draws a card.

It makes a new and really interresting mechanic into the game.