Guest posts by Belthazar666

25

General Discussion / Re: Poison decks

« on: January 06, 2011, 02:56:23 am »

Here is what I used unupped.

Code: [Select]

52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52o 52o 52o 52o 52o 52o 52q 52q 52r 52r 52r 52r 52r 52r 52t 52t 52t 52t 52t
I still use this deck, only upped and with a very slight variation.

Arsenic can be replaced with another pillar+dragon, or one of them for a spider.

26

Trial of Time / Re: 3rd Trials - Signing up

« on: January 03, 2011, 08:16:45 am »

Signing up.

Score: 20,172

Posts: 417

27

Forge Archive / Re: Astral Tiger | Celestial Tiger

« on: December 18, 2010, 09:03:04 pm »

Attack CAN go into the negative with sufficient HP buffs....stat caps at 12.

If you cap HP at 12, how can you make its attack go negative?

Technically, if you have negative one attack, and 13 HP, it would total to 12.

28

Time / Re: Timely News

« on: December 18, 2010, 01:43:34 am »

Glad to see Darkness/Time hasn't lost it's touch.

29

Light / Re: Luciferin | Lucifrase & Light Nymph

« on: December 17, 2010, 07:03:02 am »

This makes my Light/Life deck much better now. I'm happy.

30

Post Your PvP Event Ideas Here / Re: Elements Hold 'Em

« on: December 12, 2010, 03:52:55 am »

So why does Time get 5 cards?

Light does, too.

31

General Discussion / Re: Elements Christmas Sweeptakes!

« on: December 11, 2010, 07:21:25 pm »

Much like others, I'm gonna go with a one day change to the game. Only, instead of a fancy background or a cool pet, the Oracle should be changed to Santa temporarily, and everyone should receive a random nymph. Perhaps instead of random they should be either Green or Red nymphs, keeping with the Christmas theme.

32

Time / Re: Round 7 - Decks

« on: December 11, 2010, 07:05:01 pm »

Here's to lasting another round.

33

Entropy / Re: Schrödinger's Cat

« on: November 29, 2010, 11:13:57 pm »

If the Lycan's are in a deck for a BE, then you don't need darkness... That would cause them to not work with BE.

BE is the type of card that you don't need to use on lots of creatures; but you don't want to have only 1 in the deck if you rely on it. Therefore its best use is with creatures who are otherwise useful but for one of which you might use BE. It's a matter of good deckbuilding.

I'm still not seeing your point. This card wouldn't be good without BE. Heck, this card is kind of useless in an entropy mono. The only benefit this has over lycan is that it costs 1 less to play. Regardless if you're taking Lycans or Cat's for BE, you're going to be left with useless extras. As stated before, this just costs one less. If you go duo, you wouldn't be left with useless cards, since you could use them as stronger creatures.


Anyway, I'm expecting to see more death effect cards relatively soon, if not with this card, then hopefully the next update.

34

Entropy / Re: Schrödinger's Cat

« on: November 29, 2010, 10:28:17 pm »

If the Lycan's are in a deck for a BE, then you don't need darkness... That would cause them to not work with BE.

35

Time / Re: Round 5 - Salvaging, Discarding, Penalties and Converting

« on: November 29, 2010, 08:15:47 pm »

I thought Holy Light didn't do direct damage to a player, regardless of mark.

36

Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 27 November 2010 - Pandora's Toolbox - upgraded

« on: November 27, 2010, 06:07:38 pm »

Belthazar666 1 - 0 Brettbstock