Guest Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Averam (12)

Pages: [1]
1
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 11, 2010, 02:10:40 am »
Wish I had some nymphs... either purple or air... or both.

2
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 08, 2010, 05:42:45 pm »
Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 77f 77f 7ai 7ak 7dq 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7q5 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 80j

Ok. This variant I built is fatter.


- Pros

MindGate provides extra cards
No more Fractal problems. (Firefly Queen was necessary with Fractal).
3rd Hourglass
Scorpio is WAY easier.
You can get the Eternity from some Gods.


- Cons

FATTER
Slower
I am absolutely going to try this out.

3
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 08, 2010, 02:06:38 am »
I am having issues with the jade shield, I just don't see what it adds. If it is protection from being exploded it seems like a PA would be much better, because the freezing part of permafrost is essential for keeping me alive I feel. In the matches where I can't draw permafrost or it gets destroyed and i have to rely on a jade shield, I have found it is very often not enough to keep me alive anyway. That is when I realize how amazing the freezing property is.

In other words, a PAed permafrost > jade shield by far.





4
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 07, 2010, 03:35:21 am »
I am trying that variant out now. I am kind of on the fence about jade shield though...


Although I will say, it certainly has Octane's goat...


5
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 06, 2010, 12:33:23 am »
Some more stats (since I started recording them)

Total wins: 37
Total losses: 28*

Breakdown:

Scorpio: 1/4
Destiny: 3/3
Miracle: 4/5
Neptune: 4/6
Decay: 1/3
Chaos Lord: 2/4
Gemini: 2/4
Elidonis: 2/4
Osiris: 5/6
Obliterator: 1/3
Firefly Queen: 0/1
Incarnate: 2/2
Seism: 1/1
Ferox: 3/6
Morte: 1/2
Divine Glory: 1/2
Octane: 2/3
Graviton: 1/4
Paradox: 1/1

And in case anyone is curious I got a total of 17, which makes nearly half the wins EM.



* I skipped all  Dark Matters, rainbows, and eternal phoenix as the win rate is so low they aren't worth spending the time attempting when I am grinding electrums and as such did not include their stats

6
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 04, 2010, 09:34:04 pm »
In case anyone is interested in trying the deck but on the fence, here are my stats for the day:

Wins (9): Destiny, miracle, neptune, decay, chaos lord, gemini x 2, elidonis, osiris

Losses (3): eternal phoenix, Scorpio, Obliterator (it was a race to pulverizer and he got his out with PA on his second turn = gg)




It was a very good day hehe.

7
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 04, 2010, 05:59:05 am »
I am pleased to announce that after several hours of grinding FGs (this game is so addictive) my deck is already nearly finished being upgraded.

(http://helltgivre.free.fr/elements/?mark=4sj&deck=52sz25c2z2621622z76qqz56rnz66u3z26u7z277fz27dqz27gp7n3z27q5)

I can win fairly consistently versus most of the gods, the exceptions being scorpio, divine glory, eternal phoenix, and any of the other obvious ones (dark matter /sigh)

Now that I am finally about finished upgrading this deck I can use it to start generating revenue for a pvp deck and other things...

Did I mention this game is addictive?

8
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 03, 2010, 09:12:48 pm »
Always use Aflatoxin.  While not used to its full potential here it's still a great card.

One of my favorite decks against FGs is a rainbow with a base of... Otyugh, Aflatoxin, Jade Shield.  Theres more spells and some heavy hitters but Otyughs and Aflatoxins = Total Control
I would love to see that deck too.

9
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 03, 2010, 09:08:08 pm »
I just beat graviton and then seism right in a row, two of the ones I struggle with the most. I do believe that aflatoxin helped quite a bit with seism, I decided to throw it in to test it out.

10
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 03, 2010, 08:34:43 pm »
Thank you both for responding, it will help me a ton when deciding what to upgrade next.

11
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 03, 2010, 07:47:02 pm »
Sorry about that, here is what I have so far

(http://helltgivre.free.fr/elements/?mark=4sj&deck=z44saz24vn58vz25faz25i95oj5rlz2621622z36qqz66rnz66u377fz27q5)



I am missing miracle completely, was hoping to simply win one already upgraded from miracle, but I can't seem to beat him at all, he just chains miracle and I run out of cards and lose.

12
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: September 03, 2010, 06:24:44 pm »
I am relatively new to this game, I decided to start investing into this deck for farming False gods and generating some revenue. I have had some success with it so far, and my deck is mostly unupped, though I have started upgrading it slowly.

My question is this, given my circumstances, which cards of the deck would you upgrade first in order to increase the win % the most? I started with supernova and the quantum towers because without them quanta generation was way too slow, and they are generic enough i can use them in other decks too. Was this a good idea? what should I aim for next? I also already have 2 upgraded hourglasses, 6 upped shards, and an upgraded pulverizer I won from obliterator.

Pages: [1]
blarg: