1
Entropy / Re: Newb Entropy Deck (AI2 Farmer)
« on: January 31, 2011, 03:45:16 am »
thats 28, need two more..
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
You have already used 8 spell cards, 4 of which are none too useful to begin with. So I would say it isn't a rush deck. I don't see the shriekers you mentioned, and only 4 graboids. That is a waste of quanta. Dragons are too expensive for a rush anyway.I did fix the part where it says Shriekers.
This deck is stuck halfway. It isn't a good rush and it isn't a good control either. Even in a control, I would not use dragons. Would not use PA either. You have rewinds/quicksands and basilisk blood to choose from. All of which I consider superior.
I could see your point, if you had made a stall. Add dragons, shields, a few PA, maybe the pulvy. That way there is an actual use for it. Cost makes no difference, since here you will spam granite skins before you lay out the dragons. That is a fun build. Bit more difficult to play but it does work.
778 778 778 778 778 778 778 778 778 778 778 77b 77b 77b 77b 77g 77g 77g 77g 77i 77i 77i 77i 77j 77j 77j 77j 78q 78q 78q
Doesn't work that way -- you'll only end up with way too much quanta that you won't be able to use.This is true, I wasn't thinking of that (Obviously) when I thought of that.
Splitting Towers and Pendulums only works if the mark is the same as the element of the deck's cards.
Protect Artifacts seem a little counter-intuitive in a rush deck, especially 4 of them for 1 pile of towers. Go for either more offense, more towers or even some Precognitions.I have the 4 PA's for a better draw rate. But that also makes it a Duo deck, and that's not what I wanted. Also more towers would give it too much quanta.
778 778 778 778 778 778 778 77b 77b 77b 77b 77g 77g 77g 77g 77i 77i 77i 77i 77j 77j 77j 77j 78q 78q 78q 78q 78q 78q 78q
[/s]