All 3 decks are, with switched up marks
5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5id 5id 5id 5id 5id 5id 5ie 5ie 5ie 5ie 5ie 5ie
Game 1: Air Mark
He says he should've won, but I maintain my deck was much faster (more quanta generation and more creatures) and would usually win
Game 2: Water Mark
Last game was about rushing, so I switched to a water mark
I got 4 pillars (optimalish) so I was able to play creatures quickly
Both his first two chaos seeds froze my toads (the worse possibilities were Parallel Universe, shockwave, and lightning)
He antimattered the first dragon, but then the dragons unfroze
I played two more dragons, one was antimattered.
IDK which deck wins more often in this matchup (him if he had more antimatters, but 3 is not enough)
Game 3: Air Mark
Last game required killing my own dragons, sow switched to a mark capable of negating antimatter
Didn't draw a single tears the whole game. Even so I was one turn away from winning.
Misleading, he had 4 health, then got me into 19 health (two dragons while I had 18 health, although it looked like it was completely yellow) so not technically
He drew 10 pends at the end of 8 turns I believe, which started out good for him, but didn't work out
Decks were pretty evenly matched in terms of speed, given his slightly more inconsistent quanta, and cheaper copying
A10 Toadfish
B12 Relic
C9 3x Relic
D11 Trident
E7 2x Relic
F8 Water/Ice/Arctic Dragon
G1 Relic
H3 Relic
I5 Armagio
J4 5x Relic
K6 Relic
L2 4x Relic
ABCD is a square
21 for winning
1 for losing
Target Ice Dragon, Toadfish, Trident
No relics spent
21 relic payday! means I'm catching up!