Shard of Focus | Shard of Focus

[corky]

Then maybe this..

Accretion:

Turn permanent into a Photon 1 turn and gain +0/+15.
Turn into a black hole if HP>50.

From Wiki: photon spheres can only exist in the space surrounding an extremely compact object, such as a black hole or a neutron star.

That seems to fit in perfectly with the gravity theme.

[eaglgenes101]

I was thinking of a fractal SoF deck. Get out quantum towers, fractal a SoF, grow several SoF, then catapult them.
Can someone try that please?

[kimham8a]

why use quantum towers?

[furballdn]

why use quantum towers?

One quantum tower can almost power one SoF since SoF use random quanta.

That actually gets me thinking. Mitosis+SoF+catapult.

[eaglgenes101]

why use quantum towers?

SoF gives a bit of stalling power, so quantum towers give more quanta over the long run.

[Nepycros]

I just realized how great Gravity Pull is on these guys. o.o For 3 and 1 , you've got a creature with basically 0: Heal x3 + 0: Destroy. o.o

[furballdn]

I just realized how great Gravity Pull is on these guys. o.o For 3 and 1 , you've got a creature with basically 0: Heal x3 + 0: Destroy. o.o

inorite? (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,37057.0.html)

[Picheleiro]

Encyclopedia britannica will print that image besides overpowered, overwhelming, annoying, oath, unkind, perfidius, bitch ...

Every page, almost.







Also, wikipedia, larousse, oxford...

[The Chosen One]

very powerfull!

[ddevans96]

Encyclopedia britannica will print that image besides overpowered, overwhelming, annoying, oath, unkind, perfidius, bitch ...

Awesome, we need the publicity

[Gunthar]

I feel, that the name Shard of Focus does not fit to the card. Focus sounds more offensive but the power looks like a gravity effect. Therefore Shard of Gravity would fit better to this card.

The original version of the card is like a three to four time useable pulverizer but the issue is that first the power is useable for free and second it buffs the shard.
Second is that gravity would not get an additional benefit as like in the other shards.

And I'm thinking about a different version of this card:

Version 1

Shard of Gravity (creaturelike style)
It starts as a 2/10 card
The power accretion works now this way: Sacrifice a permanent and gain +2/+10. It will becomes a Black Hole if HP>40 (50 if your mark is  )

Now you need to use your own permanents to fuel this shard and gravity get an additional bonus. Overbuffing it (ex: using a Blessing on it while being at 8/40 (10/50 with mark) will turn it into the BH.

Version 2

Shard of Gravity (permanent style)
It starts as a permanent with no counters
Power accretion works here this way: Destroy a target permanent and put a counter on the Shard of Gravity.
If the number of of counters is equal or more than 2 (3 if the mark is  ) it will turns into the BH and the owner of the shard will receive 5 damage per counter from the implosion.

[burne]

Why not putting the black hole on top of your deck instead of your hand?

This way, you'll draw a dead card next if your not playing any gravity quantum.