To: suxors,
Testing vs the AI is a bit flawed..
I agree, this was meant more as an informal challenge; however, I make note in my comments if the AI plays stupidly in my comments. For example the first water deck submission, the AI with it's rules as they are technically could never win, but a human player could get some wins by holding onto the bolts.
And we could pvp it, it kind of came around informally, I only have a lot of time tonight to mess with this. And ofcourse if some people want to get together and test more great...
To: mwaetht
what do you think ended up killing the deck?
Not a whole lot of
or
Grab/Shrieker is one of the few that I've seen played that CAN beat it... a lot rides on the start of each other's hand. A good hand G/S and a poor for the other results in a win for G/S. As you will see in my results. It comes out to around 1/3rd for G/S 2/3rd for pests and vamps in my experience.
has the better bet against it than
but then again I also in part want to be proved wrong, I have an unnatural fondness for
because the first deck I built on my own was a mono
that I ran my first 100 games against AI3 after the introduction and had a 100% win rate against AI3 building up to my first AI4 grinder... So
has fondness in my heart. But when playing against the Arena or PVP there are 4 elements I ever worry about
.
Darkness itself results in ok what did that guy build. Fire is always tricky and often wins if combined with
or
effects, Entropy almost always means
and a speedbow can suck and then
in a
can stall plenty fine and turn the tables... In mono forms though
sometimes can still win and
loses it's bite. Atleast in my experience, again I want to be proven wrong.