Elemental Creature Efficiency (Strength/Cost) Study

[Anothebrother]

This study shows the average attack and defese that you would obtain by paying 1 quanta for each element...
(this study does include rares i.e. Squids/Pharoahs, but does not include nymphs do to extreme rarity. Also, this study only concerns unupped cards)


 :element paying 1 quanta of :element on average will give you a creature with att/def
  1 quanta = .846/.577
  1 quanta = .909/.636
  1 quanta = .500/1.833
  1 quanta = .893/.964
  1 quanta = 1.056/.833
  1 quanta = 1.040/.320
  1 quanta = .714/.964
  1 quanta = .789/1.000
  1 quanta = .760/ .800
  1 quanta = .636/.727
  1 quanta = .818/.492
  1 quanta = .864/.500

This data however must be taken with a grain of salt however since it does not take into account skills or abilities (i.e. lycanthropy/growth, devourer/firefly quanta production, immortal/phase dragon immaterial...etc...)

[Retribution]

Does this take into account flying weapons?

[ddevans96]

This seems about right. Gravity has focus on HP, while Fire has emphasis on Attack. This is an interesting study.

Actually, I might try using using these to balance the series I'm making.

EDIT: After three months I'm still working on this xD

[jmdt]

A quick look shows that the 4 best rush elements have the best attack ratios: life, fire, earth, death.  Doubt its a coincidence.

[coinich]

Interesting stuff.  I was looking somewhat in the same direction, though I've managed to include some, but not all, creature abilities.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6386.msg73038#msg73038

Give me a minute to rehost.