We are functioning under the simpler idea that a psionic attack is equal for all creatures at the moment, not varying among them depending on the target.
How is it varying if the end result is "the card has the same attack and abilities as it did previously, except the physical has become magical"? Surely it's varying if the end result is "the card has the same physical attack as it did previously except that is now magical rather than physical, it keeps its ability if the ability is passive or one that requires activation, but loses its ability if the ability is active but automatic"?
In the same regard, how would one make the same attack psionically? In order to transfer poison, the attack must be made directly, but a psionic attack is one of the mind, is it not?
The same way that the spell Poison transfers poison. You can't say that it's impossible to have a magical transfer of poison when there's already a spell which does exactly that.
I feel that the 'spell' Poison is only a 'spell' for the sake of fitting it into one of the three pre-existing groupings. I imagine it more of spill some of toxic substance over the opponent. An argument would to simply say it is an 'instant' card.
That is my stance regarding that, and thus, Poison is not considered in my arguments of whether it is an aspect of spell damages.
Also, how does one's attack become magical/psionic while still being physical, which I still maintain how the poison is spread? How would one magically/psionically inflect poison?
And from what I understand, you avoid making the assumption that Psions, which are endowed naturally with SoW, attack with a variation of Lightning, but are free to assume that a scorpion endowed with the same power attacks with a variaton that poisons?
