The Culture is to have a real PVP deck ..

[Tea is good]

UM Why ban the quantum pillar? I like my speed rainbow deck, especially when it pwns your speed fire. yeah thats right. Oh Ban the quantum pillar, not the tower. (I'll just use towers and maybe use an anti-fg deck just to annoy you)

[PuppyChow]

GG in PvP 2 dude. That deck needs some work though  8) . Last turn 12/7 dragon with steal ftw.

[ntz]

GG in PvP 2 dude. That deck needs some work though  8) . Last turn 12/7 dragon with steal ftw.

.. you had bigger luck and i'm looking forward for my next opportunity .. but thanks for very nice execution .. you ended with 100% health .. right? your deck is nice and i am happy even if slained by someone with real PVP deck ..

regards, ntz

[Zeru]

Using anti-fg in pvp is very impolite. However, you cannot force people to be polite. Bear with the noobs or use only friendly chat to duel with people you know.

[adsilcott]

Actually I've been thinking about this a lot, and I really think it should be...

An option!

Think about it, a quantum pillar restricted PVP option would really encourage people to build more creative decks, while people who can only afford an anti-fg deck can keep playing as normal.

I think this is a great idea.

[Svenningen]

I think its a HORRIBLE idea, that would restrict every rainbowdeck to live on nova's alone and that would get more boring that fun. I think having quantpillars is a good idea. And as far as people using FG decks, well, they usually arent that big of a threat, leave them be.

[unionruler]

On the contrary I think cremation-lava destroyer is the PvP deck concept most in need of a  nerf. Rainbow weenies is somewhat harder to calibrate and is more luck based in terms of what you draw so I'm alright with its current prospects.

As a noob I did use to play PvP with a rainbow anti FG on occasion for the heck of it. Of course it did win a lot of the time, but it must be said that anybody can build a good PvP deck which would be able to handle a rainbow anti FG with ease. My T50 farmers do just this, and I mean all 3 of them--mono grav with flying titans, elite chargers, black holes and gravity pulls (for the titans), fractal elite charger, speed poison with explosions is my newest one--you can view it here http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,7563.0.html (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,7563.0.html)

What I'm trying to say is that we need to be more open-minded in deckbuilding. We don't just build PvP decks, anti T50 decks and anti FGs. We build multi-purpose decks, counter-rushes and controls. If you really want people to show you something new, either wait for zanz to nerf some of the overused cards, or just focus on appreciating the imaginative-ness of the few people that are actively experimenting.

[Svenningen]

Well, say u run a cremation deck with 6photon/spark, and 6immo's, thats 12spots wasted right there.

[ntz]

An option!

Think about it, a quantum pillar restricted PVP option would really encourage people to build more creative decks, while people who can only afford an anti-fg deck can keep playing as normal.

I think this is a great idea.

.. i agree .. the most important circumstance of this would be as adsilcott said, that the poeple will be encouraged to build real anbd creative decks

[binde22]

in my nova deck i use qauntum pillars also. i understand that the first 75% is annoying but the other 20% your talking about they use it because it works lets be honest did you make up ur own false god deck from scratch? no sure it may be a bit more varied then the difference form the fire crematers but sometimes people enjoy winning to i like elements and all but i don't understand how you can call  clicking a button more exciting then clicking something else(probably going to start a flame war, i understand that suprise is enjoyable but i dont understand why suprise in a game where you click cards is) I have no idea why i enjoy elements but im srue there are others like me that play to win im all fr no rainbows but people who use generic decks sometimes are just new and you cant kick them off of pvp just because they want to win.

[ntz]

ufff .. i hate very much retarded oty+FFQ+boneyard+firestorm+fallen_druid style ....

it's just something shameful and despicable in PVP game .. i would rather loose and play with nice decks then use one of my variant of rainbow anti-FGs tin openers decks ..

hey people, show me (us) please something nicer with conception, elegance and smartness

i have for this purpose a earth+gravity deck with earthquakes and black holes, this deck wins in 90% of cases against ignorant rainbow, but it's not funny to play just only this deck and i'm not doing so ..

same for ultrafast fire cremator .. it's not very funny

decks below are good for punishing these people ..

Code: [Select]

744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 745 745 745 745 745 745 74b 74b 74f 74f 74f 74f 74f 74f 77f 77j 77j 77j 77j 77j

Code: [Select]

61p 61p 61p 61p 61p 61p 7dg 7dg 7dm 7dm 7do 7do 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds
regards, ntz

ps: apropos what i wanted to say? i have several more very nice decks with attributes above, but i can't use them against such a bull**it like the most of people use .. i want to show you my decks and i want to fight against you in epic way .. but i can't ..

[ntz]

hi there ..

i built a special purpose rainbow deck which is funny, doesn't contain any of retarded playing scenarios like FFQ+otys+bones+rain of fire and so .. it's also pretty fast and pretty menacing ..

this is rainbow deck is just a Rainbow Deck which hurts but does not suck ..

Code: [Select]

5bt 5rr 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6tt 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 711 745 77h 7dm 7ds 7ds 7gp 7k2 7n5 7t9 7tf 7tf 80i
regards, ntz