Should the anti-matter card automatically win you the fight?

[surf]

anti matter is its own counter. If you antimatter the creature that has negative attack (has already been AMed) then it goes back to positive attack.

lol, proving my comment earlier about the only effective counter is to use a anti-matter deck yourself 

Funny the comments earlier about my deck being poor, when my win-loss ratio is about 5:1. My deck is capable of beating any type, except the anti-matter type.

Anti-matter decks are indestructable, no matter what you self-styled 'experts' say.

I like implosions suggestion to 'add more attackers.' Well believe it or not, the enemy will anti-matter them as well!

[jmizzle7]

anti matter is its own counter. If you antimatter the creature that has negative attack (has already been AMed) then it goes back to positive attack.

lol, proving my comment earlier about the only effective counter is to use a anti-matter deck yourself 

Funny the comments earlier about my deck being poor, when my win-loss ratio is about 5:1. My deck is capable of beating any type, except the anti-matter type.

Anti-matter decks are indestructable, no matter what you self-styled 'experts' say.

Antimatter decks fail miserably to decks like mono Aether and mono Fire. Immaterial status for Aether and Immolation/Cremation for Fire make the Antimatter card useless.

[xdude]

anti matter is its own counter. If you antimatter the creature that has negative attack (has already been AMed) then it goes back to positive attack.

lol, proving my comment earlier about the only effective counter is to use a anti-matter deck yourself 

Funny the comments earlier about my deck being poor, when my win-loss ratio is about 5:1. My deck is capable of beating any type, except the anti-matter type.

Anti-matter decks are indestructable, no matter what you self-styled 'experts' say.

You, me, outside, NOW. You play an AM deck, I play a deck without AM's. I win.

[surf]

You, me, outside, NOW. You play an AM deck, I play a deck without AM's. I win.

Ha Ha, you know you'd get crushed. Not because i'm a better player, but because i have the unbeatable deck 

[xdude]

You, me, outside, NOW. You play an AM deck, I play a deck without AM's. I win.

Ha Ha, you know you'd get crushed. Not because i'm a better player, but because i have the unbeatable deck 

So, what's stopping you from coming?

[surf]

Antimatter decks fail miserably to decks like mono Aether and mono Fire. Immaterial status for Aether and Immolation/Cremation for Fire make the Antimatter card useless.

lol, how could mono-fire work? Just anti-matter all those fire dragons and the fire is dead.

As for mono-Aether, they're easily dealt with by anti-matter. All you have to do is use a dissipation shield and the Aether can't touch you.   

[miniwally]

Antimatter decks fail miserably to decks like mono Aether and mono Fire. Immaterial status for Aether and Immolation/Cremation for Fire make the Antimatter card useless.

lol, how could mono-fire work? Just anti-matter all those fire dragons and the fire is dead.

As for mono-Aether, they're easily dealt with by anti-matter. All you have to do is use a dissipation shield and the Aether can't touch you.   

You immolate any AM creatures if you read what he put and Gl1tch (I think) posted how to counter it with any deck.

[surf]

So, what's stopping you from coming?

Lucky for you, i don't actually have a anti-matter deck   

Think about it. You can't play any monsters, because they'd be anti-mattered, or mutated then anti-mattered. You lose! 

[surf]

Antimatter decks fail miserably to decks like mono Aether and mono Fire. Immaterial status for Aether and Immolation/Cremation for Fire make the Antimatter card useless.

lol, how could mono-fire work? Just anti-matter all those fire dragons and the fire is dead.

As for mono-Aether, they're easily dealt with by anti-matter. All you have to do is use a dissipation shield and the Aether can't touch you.   

You immolate any AM creatures if you read what he put and Gl1tch (I think) posted how to counter it with any deck.

lol, and then you've got no creatures left to fight with!!!

[miniwally]

You, me, outside, NOW. You play an AM deck, I play a deck without AM's. I win.

Ha Ha, you know you'd get crushed. Not because i'm a better player, but because i have the unbeatable deck 

So, what's stopping you from coming?

Lucky for you, i don't actually have a anti-matter deck   

Think about it. You can't play any monsters, because they'd be anti-mattered, or mutated then anti-mattered. You lose! 

[/quote]

Oh just go in chat and everyone can prove to you how antimatter decks aren't all that good, if there so good buy them not like it's expensive for a person with 5:1 win ratio also play someone with this 'unbeatable' deck of yours.

[xdude]

You, me, outside, NOW. You play an AM deck, I play a deck without AM's. I win.

Ha Ha, you know you'd get crushed. Not because i'm a better player, but because i have the unbeatable deck 

So, what's stopping you from coming?
[/quote]

Lucky for you, i don't actually have a anti-matter deck   

Think about it. You can't play any monsters, because they'd be anti-mattered, or mutated then anti-mattered. You lose! 
[/quote]

... No, it's not like you could AM all of my 17 monsters. Just because your deck is too weak to face a medium-powered card, like AM, doesn't mean the card is broken. Learn to think before posting rubbish and insulting people, or learn not to post anymore.

[surf]

... No, it's not like you could AM all of my 17 monsters. Just because your deck is too weak to face a medium-powered card, like AM, doesn't mean the card is broken. Learn to think before posting rubbish and insulting people, or learn not to post anymore.

No. But then again, you can't play all 17 at once!

You usually have to play them one at a time. Then they get anti-mattered, and in the meantime the anti-matter deck can use its own monsters to kill you!