Should Dragons have abilities?

[TheonlyrealBeef]

I don't see why Dragons need a buff, they are costly for their attack, but make up for it in card ratio and ability to surpass shields (in which I try to say one creature with 10 attack is better than two creatures with 5 for example). As has been stated before, but why not make a poll on it?
I love polls.

[vile]

I don't see why Dragons need a buff, they are costly for their attack, but make up for it in card ratio and ability to surpass shields (in which I try to say one creature with 10 attack is better than two creatures with 5 for example). As has been stated before, but why not make a poll on it?
I love polls.

I second this notion.  Although dragons would be neat to have some sort of secondary passive ability or ability to use, it would be way to overpowered.  Dragons are already at the top of the curve in this game

[kevchuez]

dragon probably made by the creators 'just' because of it's damage.. but, if dragons have abilities, the damage should be lower than usual.. if that's the case, dragons will be lobotomized and do nothing, like another common creatures..