*Author

IQuit!

  • Guest
dark/aether, kinda broken, or totally broken? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6654.msg70357#msg70357
« on: May 18, 2010, 01:28:05 am »
I've been playing a few games, and have been beaten by the dark/aether combo modeled after the false god (the one that uses fractal/devourers/vampires), and I usually wind up flailing to get my deck started.  On thinking of a counter, the only counter I can think of is a fire deck which is the only mark with multiple creature control (yeah, lightning storm DOES NOT count as it sucks).  Every other rush deck can be beaten by a non rush deck, some more successfully than others depending on the match up and draw.  But this particular build seems to have everything: permanent control (steal), anti-pillar control (devourers), creature control (drain life), and can easily be adjusted using fractal as all the cards involved are low cost...

Is there some secret to this deck?  I feel that any strategy I ask for will come with a 'what are you playing' which tells me that each (some) deck(s) can only beat this combo with a specialized strategy.

Apologies if this is an old topic as I just joined (match means number placement and not shade???), and the search feature is too easy to use that I could find exactly what I was looking.

icybraker

  • Guest
Re: dark/aether, kinda broken, or totally broken? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6654.msg70362#msg70362
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2010, 01:34:23 am »
Quote
modeled after the false god (the one that uses fractal/devourers/vampires),
Wrong. The False God was based upon the deck, not the other way around. ;)

Every deck has a counter. There are many counters to a Devourer deck. Mass creature control is one. A Jade Shield or a similarly good shield (although Jade Shields work best, decks without Drain Life can be beaten with a damage shield and decks without Eclipse can be beaten with a reflecting shield) and a big deck can deck it out very easily. A Rainbow deck can very easily produce more quanta than it drains. Additionally, a fast deck is often enough to counter the deck's slow setup, or a lucky Aflatoxin deck.

Those are 5 decks that can beat the Devourer deck most of the time. This combo is very strong, but it is beatable.

Offline Bloodshadow

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
  • Country: ca
  • Reputation Power: 46
  • Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.Bloodshadow is towering like an Amethyst Dragon over their peers.
  • 吞天纳地,魔渡众生。天下万物,唯我至尊。
  • Awards: Ultimate Profile WinnerOpposites Attract
Re: dark/aether, kinda broken, or totally broken? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6654.msg70385#msg70385
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2010, 02:59:10 am »
The trick is to beat the deck before he can get the combo going. It'll take a while to get 10+ Devourers on the field.

Also, Flooding + lots of pillars. It restricts the number of Devourers to 7.
To be or not to be, I can do both at once. Go learn quantum mechanics, n00b.

Cynxos

  • Guest
Re: dark/aether, kinda broken, or totally broken? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6654.msg72034#msg72034
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2010, 10:39:59 pm »
I have to admit that I've come across allot of hate towards this build in pvp.
I've been using it on a new accout for a while, and people are just out right cursing me for using it, telling me that I'm unoriginal and even the famous mid-game Leave.
And regarding a startagy with this deck, it's pretty straightforward, but there are some times where some thinking is required if you want to win.

 

blarg: