openEtG

[Submachine]

Bug report: Sanctuary doesn't protect quanta from devourers.

can we have a special sign or symbol for account bound cards?

EDIT: could we also have something so we can see what rank our arena deck is, with the person both above and below it?

My request with arena with be to see what deck did we submit. It would also be good if we could instanly import and change it as needed.

I also had something else in mind but I forgot. ._.

[iancudorinmarian]

Me and tree want to start a petition for chaos shield to have only the random effect chance and not the miss chance as well:

1) iancudorinmarian
2) treebeard_xiii

Add yourself to the petition if you agree.

[BluePriest]

Me and tree want to start a petition for chaos shield to have only the random effect chance and not the miss chance as well:

1) iancudorinmarian
2) treebeard_xiii

Add yourself to the petition if you agree.

This isnt really the best way to get it changed. Card balance should not be based on if a majority want it to be that way or not, it should be based on the arguments made that the card is OP or UP. Otherwise if you had a majority that wanted a card to be 1 hit kill for no quanta then it would be possible.

[dawn to dusk]

Me and tree want to start a petition for chaos shield to have only the random effect chance and not the miss chance as well:

1) iancudorinmarian
2) treebeard_xiii

Add yourself to the petition if you agree.

This isnt really the best way to get it changed. Card balance should not be based on if a majority want it to be that way or not, it should be based on the arguments made that the card is OP or UP. Otherwise if you had a majority that wanted a card to be 1 hit kill for no quanta then it would be possible.

it worked for mafia

[treebeard xiii]

Me and tree want to start a petition for chaos shield to have only the random effect chance and not the miss chance as well:

1) iancudorinmarian
2) treebeard_xiii

Add yourself to the petition if you agree.

This isnt really the best way to get it changed. Card balance should not be based on if a majority want it to be that way or not, it should be based on the arguments made that the card is OP or UP. Otherwise if you had a majority that wanted a card to be 1 hit kill for no quanta then it would be possible.

problem being when the cards creator first made the card there was a good hour of discussion involved in how balanced it was in the variation that has been added certain member even went to the extent of creating a viable formula for measuring shield cost. However iirc this card was added by fippe while the conversation was still going on. Admittedly entropy did need another shield none can deny that for either oetg or normal elements but this card has too much going on mass pandemonium or missing seems a bit unfair to me it's like having two shields for the price of one. Personally I feel the card should only have the mass pandemonium effect at a slightly higher chance. Basically this card is a dusk shield with two different effects making up the effect, yes if dusk blocks an attack it does in fact block the attack whereas chaos shield only blocks an attack 50% of the time it works the other 50% however can shutdown the creature permanently or for 3 turns or not shut it down at all. Yes the cost increase balanced it a bit but I still feel it is fairly strong considering the impact either pandemonium or dusk can make on a duel. Of course that is just my opinion.

[Submachine]

Fippe, I still want to note, that even after your attempt to fix it, devourers still devour quanta throught sanctuary.

[Fippe94]

Fippe, I still want to note, that even after your attempt to fix it, devourers still devour quanta throught sanctuary.

I tried it myself just now, and devourers do get blocked by sanctuary. Are you sure this still happened, and if it did, any messages in the console?

[Fippe94]

So, got our own forum in development, check it out here: http://oetg.boards.net/ Feel free to make an account and make useful posts/topic in a relevant section.

Note that I will still post in this topic and keep the OP updated, just like before. I am not simply replacing the topic with the forum, they will both co-exist for everyone's benefit.

Also, some updates:
Various bugfixes done and shield behaviour are now changed: As long as a creature have more than 0 attack, they will get affected by shields.

[OdinVanguard]

So, got our own forum in development, check it out here: http://oetg.boards.net/ Feel free to make an account and make useful posts/topic in a relevant section.

Note that I will still post in this topic and keep the OP updated, just like before. I am not simply replacing the topic with the forum, they will both co-exist for everyone's benefit.

Also, some updates:
Various bugfixes done and shield behaviour are now changed: As long as a creature have more than 0 attack, they will get affected by shields.

Yay! New forum. Hopefully that will help lower the congestion on this topic a little.

[iancudorinmarian]

Seems like the game doesn't work again for me. I get only a bluescreen instead of that UI. You know what I'm talking about, I've showed you pictures before.

I get the "cannot read appendchild of NULL".

If this isn't fixed soon, I'll have to forfeit on the tourney.

[andretimpa]

Seems like the game doesn't work again for me. I get only a bluescreen instead of that UI. You know what I'm talking about, I've showed you pictures before.

I get the "cannot read appendchild of NULL".

If this isn't fixed soon, I'll have to forfeit on the tourney.

 

[Fippe94]

Seems like the game doesn't work again for me. I get only a bluescreen instead of that UI. You know what I'm talking about, I've showed you pictures before.

I get the "cannot read appendchild of NULL".

If this isn't fixed soon, I'll have to forfeit on the tourney.

Console again, please.

If this is really the same problem you had the last time, I have sadly no idea how to fix that, and the problems seems to be specific for you only