openEtG

[antiaverage]

Made some elemental symbols that keep the same colors but use different designs than the ones in EtG

Needs a Chroma for Other/Chroma stuff

 

[andretimpa]

Made some elemental symbols that keep the same colors but use different designs than the ones in EtG

Needs a Chroma for Other/Chroma stuff

 

Delivered:

[antiaverage]

Awesome, thank you. Currently serprex just put in a gray version of the Entropy icon you made. This is better.

Btw, which graphics tool are you using?

[andretimpa]

These were all done in gimp, as I know my way around it better than in photoshop.

[eaglgenes101]

For AI I could compile together files relating to how the AI should play cards (which cards to play first, which cards grow/shrink, which cards multiply buffs, etc. ).
Oh, and which license is this project under? What's the ultimate goal?

[antiaverage]

Oh, and which license is this project under?

We were discussing MIT or http://unlicense.org

[serprex]

Added Chroma icon, https://github.com/serprex/openEtG/commit/04d11a8e33d611add5ebf01a01cb1b6e0be1c4c9
Added MIT license, https://github.com/serprex/openEtG/commit/03d328a97952b324c66ef847e610712ada709fd8 (see this random thread on the internet for some FUD about unlicense)

As for AI tables, I can't say how useful that'd be. It could definitely produce an AI superior to current Elements, but if Zso's exploratory fun comes up with a good eval function then knowledge of how cards  work will be less necessary. I say less because it may be a fair optimization to not brute force evaluate whether casting lightning on your Purple Dragon is a good idea (similar point: it's been pointed out that Elements's AI would be superior if it didn't consider Fractal'ing your RoLs)
I made a small stub for how to hook AI into the GUI. I leave deeper AI development to whoever makes a good pull request. My current development focus is updating layout to make use of vrt's art (in such a way that doesn't require graphics for everything)

On my ultimate goal: I don't know. I don't think long term. When I use programs, I think about how they're made. Grinding Elements gave me a lot of time to think about how I'd implement it. Then I asked ITR whether it'd be a good idea & he said it would. So I did

PS on active question I raised previously: I asked Cal since nobody was saying anything here, and have been convinced to keep all spells that change actives having a lobo effect besides Mitosis

[eaglgenes101]

First of all I'm creating a list of abilities and cards. Regexes in libreoffice are confusing...

[eaglgenes101]

-snip-
(This post used to have a list of active abilities and cards from EtG. Maintaining only so everything below makes sense.)

[serprex]

While I appreciate the effort, note that Improved and Elite prefixes have been removed, and that internal active names differ. Not to mention additions/subtractions I've made to the card pool
As linked in the original post, Cards @ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhacMqaIJo6ddG5rTXpxaHFOR20wVUZwMWZZRUlEWkE
CardDB for Elements is @ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao07Zx9C3FLcdFdXV0tpOWhKeDExNmhTdHgwVkg0NFE

Which is to say that your list at first sight appears to be an unfortunate mix of redundancy and describing Elements's card pool rather than openEtG's

[eaglgenes101]

Starting work. My current progress can be viewed here:
https://docs.zoho.com/sheet/published.do?rid=1m466ec3af1bba2be49afa951013359a66fdd
(Using zoho because GDocs doesn't mesh well with libreoffice despite having conversion support)
How to read: Highest numbered cards should be played first, then lower numbered cards. I set 0 to be the priority of a normal vanilla creature.

[eaglgenes101]

I can't think of every possibility by myself! Help!