Is AI5 a Fair Test of Survivability Against False Gods?

[lskpiano]

Is it a fair statement that if your deck can't survive against Half Bloods, there's no way you'll survive against False Gods? In general, I mean. And not beating, just surviving a decent number of turns.

It may seem obvious but it just occurred to me. Interested in what others think.

Thanks,
LSK Piano

[Genuinous]

Decks which are good against FG will do  good against HB as well. However you might beat HB and get pwned against FG.
elementsthegame.com/trainer.html (http://elementsthegame.com/trainer.html) if you want to test

[lskpiano]

However you might beat HB and get pwned against FG.

Absolutely. I just wondered if the reverse was true, meaning if you can't beat HB, no way will you beat FG. Makes sense.

Thanks,
LSK Piano

[Tea is good]

half bloods are easy as pie. They are in no way to be compared to false gods in terms of difficulty.

[lskpiano]

half bloods are easy as pie. They are in no way to be compared to false gods in terms of difficulty.

Of course not. My point is slightly different. Can you think of a deck that can beat FGs that can't beat HBs? In other words, is ability to beat HBs necessary but not sufficient to beating FGs.

Just a philosophical or logic question. I obviously have too much time on my hands.

Thanks,
LSK Piano

[Genuinous]

A simple fire stall or mono aether will beat almost any HB, but only selected or none FG. HB, imho, are only worth until you get a good deck against FG.

Try trainer if you wanna prepare for FG, HB is a different pie

[TheForbiddenOracle]

There are some decks that are good against CERTAIN FG that will never do against HB. For example a single permanent control spells some losses for some decks

[lskpiano]

There are some decks that are good against CERTAIN FG that will never do against HB. For example a single permanent control spells some losses for some decks

Now, that's interesting. In other words, against FGs with no perm control, you can design a deck without worrying about it, but HBs will almost always have some form of it.

Okay, let's narrow the question. Can you think of a  FG deck that can't also beat HBs? Just curious.

Thanks,
LSK Piano

[TheForbiddenOracle]

There are some decks that are good against CERTAIN FG that will never do against HB. For example a single permanent control spells some losses for some decks

Now, that's interesting. In other words, against FGs with no perm control, you can design a deck without worrying about it, but HBs will almost always have some form of it.

Okay, let's narrow the question. Can you think of a  FG deck that can't also beat HBs? Just curious.

Thanks,
LSK Piano

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,10453.0.html

[lskpiano]

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,10453.0.html

Cool. I hadn't stumbled across that deck yet. I'll give it a try. Always open to a new learning experience.

Thanks and kudos!

LSK Piano

[Monox D. I-Fly]

Obvious answer is obvious. Higher level is generally stronger, though may be not always. I just wonder can someone win against both of them with no upgraded card at all?

[Weiyaoli]

AFAIK RoL/Hope will struggle against some HB, especially those has more PC and CC. I can't really think of any that CAN'T beat HBs though.