*Author

Cisco

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4320#msg4320
« Reply #12 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

yes if you farmed ai3 that be true. How long does it take to get 180000 points farming l3?  Chival has not been in the top rankings all to long that is why I was asking. Playing a bot l3 though 24/7 would be an explanation. As Zan has no rules to this It is not considered cheating.

ElementalGod

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4321#msg4321
« Reply #13 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Major Kudos! As I only have 25K score I clearly cannot tell you, but I would guess this is a glitch of some kind!

Evil Hamster

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4322#msg4322
« Reply #14 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

and i usually play the gods believe it or not, with a different deck. I just always make sure i have the mono fire equiped when i submit highscore because I dont want to give my god farming deck away.

I dont use the average god farming deck. mine is built on speed, Im not ready to reveal it yet, although if you search my post history you may find the basic components of it.
The database picks up your current deck whenever you are picked as T50 opponent no matter what you had when you submit your score.

Evil Hamster

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4323#msg4323
« Reply #15 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Quote from: Evil Hamster
The database picks up your current deck whenever you are picked as T50 opponent no matter what you had when you submit your score.
no it doesnt.

test it, make a deck, submit highscore, change your mark, submit highscore.

you are now in the top50 with two different decks.
I have done it. I've signed in, changed my deck & mark and run across myself in top 50 with whatever current deck I was using at the time. I only submit score once a week or so because I don't really care too much about that.

I believe it changes whenever you save your game.

foyle

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4324#msg4324
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Chival -- I read that you are considering taking out your Anubis.  Have you tried it with protect artifacts instead? (cast Fahrenheit, Protect Artifact, then Animate Weapon and then your animated guy is immaterial).  Protect artifact is very cheap so then you should be able to get a similar effect without needing the time quanta.  Disadvantages would be that it would take up more cards in your deck (unless your deck currently includes any time towers which you could take out), and you wouldn't have the possibility of immaterializing your FFQ.  Anyway, just thought that may be something worth trying out if you haven't already.

foyle

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4325#msg4325
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Oh, strange.  The AI did it to me last night which is why I thought you could.  The animated weapon definitely still had the immaterial mark, but I don't think I actually tried to target it so perhaps it was only the graphic that carried on.

Offline jmizzle7

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3058
  • Reputation Power: 34
  • jmizzle7 is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmizzle7 is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmizzle7 is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmizzle7 is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmizzle7 is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmizzle7 is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.
  • I'm kind of a big deal. People know me.
  • Awards: Weekly Tournament WinnerSS Competition #1 1stCard Design Competition Winner
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4326#msg4326
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Chival -- I read that you are considering taking out your Anubis.  Have you tried it with protect artifacts instead? (cast Fahrenheit, Protect Artifact, then Animate Weapon and then your animated guy is immaterial).  Protect artifact is very cheap so then you should be able to get a similar effect without needing the time quanta.  Disadvantages would be that it would take up more cards in your deck (unless your deck currently includes any time towers which you could take out), and you wouldn't have the possibility of immaterializing your FFQ.  Anyway, just thought that may be something worth trying out if you haven't already.
already tried that, enchanting the weapon then animating it doesn't keep it immaterial unfortunately. You would think it should, but it doesnt. i assume its a bug.
It's not really a bug, Chival. The mechanics of the Flying Weapon card are similar to steal. It effectively destroys the card and puts another copy into play as a creature, which is why immaterial status doesn't stay unless it was already inherent on the card, i.e. Morning Star.

JTWood

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4327#msg4327
« Reply #19 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

If I only farmed AI3 with my monofire deck, I'd have a 90% winning percentage - if not higher.

Scaredgirl

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4328#msg4328
« Reply #20 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

i guess saying my deck built on speed was a little misleading, what i should say is compared to the average rainbow god farming decks, its fast. the main reason its faster is that the sundials wont prevent you from doing damage with your animated Fahrenheits.

i may try taking my anubis out, it would be more vulnerable to creature control and would likely lose more, but it would win or lose faster at least.

Have you actually tested this Fahrenheit deck? I've tried tons of different versions of it and none of them worked nearly as good as the standard Anti-God rainbow.

Yes, Fahrenheits do damage even with Sundials on, but the problem for me has always been: How do you get tons of fire quantum with a rainbow deck? Sure Fireflies produce it, but getting tons of them on the table fast is easier said then done.

I've tested all kinds of weapon decks and the one I did with Eternity was hands down the best, and even it was very vulnerable against some of the Gods.

But yeah.. I'm very interested to see this "secret" deck :)

Scaredgirl

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4329#msg4329
« Reply #21 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Well you need at least 3 farenheits and some pu. immolation has to be a big part of it as well. the problem is to get max fire quanta you need a big deck as far as I can see. using multiple weapons works better but same problem it simply to slow. I don´t think chival was saying it is as good as the rainbows out right now just fast.  I couldn´t get a weapon deck working that goes over 50%. Thene again I never thought of using more than two fareheits.
Yeah, but that's my point. How can it be fast with so little fire quanta coming in? Only way to get it fast is to have fire Towers and Immolation.

thearchduke

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4330#msg4330
« Reply #22 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Ah ha, I see.  Good idea for those with the fahrenheits to make the deck, perhaps one day I'll get there. 

Incidentally, it seems as though the game's odds on winning spins from beating false gods have been adjusted downward.  Before, I would get a card about a third to a half of the wins I had against FGs, now it's much lower...

thearchduke

  • Guest
I think I hit maximum wins? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=461.msg4331#msg4331
« Reply #23 on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Chival has been in the top fifty for at least a few weeks, and who cares if he uses a bot?  I remember thinking it was odd that he was the ONLY mono-fire deck in the top fifty when everybody else was running rainbows, but it makes sense if a robot was running the deck.  It would be much easier to program a bot to play mono-fire than rainbow.

 

blarg: