*Author

Evil Hamster

  • Guest
top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6198#msg6198
« on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

About all-pillars decks i agree with you: dont know why people do it, seems something like "i dont want you to grab my rares", and i truly dislike it.
I don't know why people do that either unless they're actively working on a deck or something. I've just stuffed a bunch of cards in my deck when I needed 30 to switch to a different screen for some reason.

I just look at it as a fast 75 coins and move on :)

Forfeit

  • Guest
top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6199#msg6199
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

I actually lost in the t50 do to a farming deck that had just a weapon in it. My deck depended on PU an opponents creature. Needless to say, i agree with what you're saying.

Edit: But a t50 player should have the option to withdraw there deck from the fighting list if they don't agree with the changes.

Scaredgirl

  • Guest
top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6200#msg6200
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

No worries then :)

And now i see your point much better. While im all for making sure we can use different types of decks, i just dont see the point in having rare cards if everyone has 3 of each one. Im sure we will have more cards to choose from at some point, but if we already have all the rares they will soon seem like any other card.

The game in beta as it is, i can understand the problems with people getting bored quickly without other things to aim for or any more deck types to try, but long term i just feel keeping rare cards rare would be better.
Rare cards = more grind = bad

turin

  • Guest
top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6201#msg6201
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

You seem fool.
I'm in top 50 and won 3200 games, most of them against top 50, and i've 3 pulverizers, 2 eternities, 2 squids and 1 discord.
This seems too much to you??? Do you ever thought about cards winning percentages? Rare farm decks are a NEED, or once you had an idea based on a rare, you'll just have to wait a year before playing it because you've not the cards.

turin

  • Guest
top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6202#msg6202
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

About all-pillars decks i agree with you: dont know why people do it, seems something like "i dont want you to grab my rares", and i truly dislike it.
I don't know why people do that either unless they're actively working on a deck or something. I've just stuffed a bunch of cards in my deck when I needed 30 to switch to a different screen for some reason.

I just look at it as a fast 75 coins and move on :)
maybe next time just put some shard in: if i have no time i put 6 shard + pillars

turin

  • Guest
top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6203#msg6203
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

They are a want. not a NEED.
I have won 199 games (one more to 200!!) none against top 50
i have 0 of those last three. 0 titan 2 owls eyes one pulv, 2 druidic staffs, one shard, one fahrenhit and 2 poseiden`s.  So yes...so far it seems far too easy to get rares from what i have seen. Also about 30 of those games were with crappy decks before i created a mono one that was useable. I would say 100 vs the false gods rest vs lvl 3 mostly.

No need for personal insults. It only invalidates your argument and is an admission of your own intellectual bankruptcy. Thanks.

edit: spelling was beyond awful lol.
Insults? I apologize if it seemed an insult, and i admit it may seem it. As you i dont like aggressive posts. It was just a reaction for a too strange ipotesis: not rage but increduleness (maybe i'm inventing words...:D).
Problem is that if i want to make a deck with 2+ same rares, it would take ages without rare farming decks (excluding common rares as Eyes, miracles and some other). You've been lucky to win 2 poseidon: they're very rare, i've 1 only! And if i think about a 3 poseidons deck? Well i can easily forget it before having all 3. Rare farms in that case are needed to avoid that problem. Obviously they're not pure need, but to make the game enjoyable for beginners and more various for experts they're very good.
I must also say that my rare farming deck, when i'm off, are built to have some playability: they'e all flying weapons decks, so while farming you'll even have some fun.

About all-pillars decks i agree with you: dont know why people do it, seems something like "i dont want you to grab my rares", and i truly dislike it.

top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6204#msg6204
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

No worries then :)

And now i see your point much better. While im all for making sure we can use different types of decks, i just dont see the point in having rare cards if everyone has 3 of each one. Im sure we will have more cards to choose from at some point, but if we already have all the rares they will soon seem like any other card.

The game in beta as it is, i can understand the problems with people getting bored quickly without other things to aim for or any more deck types to try, but long term i just feel keeping rare cards rare would be better.

top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6205#msg6205
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

Oh i dont mind if the idea of the deck at all. its just too easy to win weapons off farm decks. If the designer wanted it to be hard then we shouldnt be able to circumvent that.

top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6206#msg6206
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

Rare cards only = more grind if you really want to go after them, but then, if most of the players want to be able to get ALL the cards easily enough i suppose leaving it as i is the best way. No point annoying all  your fans :P

Thx hamster.Good point about the coins, but still not like we are skint too oftern is it :)

top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6207#msg6207
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

Some changes i would like to see.

Max of two weapons. one of any one type.Ai replaces others by towers or something?

Max of 20? towers,AI replaces more with creatures. all tower decks are silly...stop it :P

I know the idea of top 50 is good. But abusing it for farming/wasting peoples time is just...meh





top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg6208#msg6208
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2009, 10:10:01 pm »

They are a want. not a NEED.
I have won 199 games (one more to 200!!) none against top 50
i have 0 of those last three. 0 titan 2 owls eyes one pulv, 2 druidic staffs, one shard, one fahrenhit and 2 poseiden`s.  So yes...so far it seems far too easy to get rares from what i have seen. Also about 30 of those games were with crappy decks before i created a mono one that was useable. I would say 100 vs the false gods rest vs lvl 3 mostly.

No need for personal insults. It only invalidates your argument and is an admission of your own intellectual bankruptcy. Thanks.

edit: spelling was beyond awful lol.

Offline ohnodavido

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Reputation Power: 1
  • ohnodavido is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • New to Elements
  • Awards: Slice of Elements 4th Birthday Cake
Re: top 50 decks https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=642.msg1052248#msg1052248
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2013, 03:02:49 pm »
I would argue that rare cards is what makes the game fun it gives you ample oppertunity to make top decks in this game with what you can have already, it is seldom that you will come accreoss op rare card decks in pvp1 but it can happen occasionly.  And when you do get them it makes your more creative as you have to use what you have not what you have seen posted somewhere, hence a great new deck is born

 

blarg: