Reduce Nymphs' Sale Value

[Leo]

I sold a Black Nymph because I just don't like liquid shadow and I don't regret it.
Now if she only had STEAL as her magic   

[RagingAlien]

Special warning
ULTRA RARE!
Special prize from competitions or from the Oracle

Awesome! i voted No, particularly because unless you got really lucky and got a nymph in your first 5 Oracle spins, you will have already learned the value of their abilities. If you want to sell them, you still can, if you don't, just the value of the card will make you not sell it. And, even if you do get the nymph at first 5 spins, the coin you recieve ends up being much more worth it than keeping the nymph for three months trying to find a good strategy for it.

[Ashebrethafe]

I agree with DD and Rastafla -- the sell price of nymphs should reflect their rarity. If everyone (or almost everyone) who sells a nymph ends up regretting it, that indicates that all those players (and all the players who got nymphs and didn't sell them) think their nymphs are/were worth more than 909 , and so the sell price should be increased.

In fact, I think the bazaar should automatically adjust the price of every card (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,25239.msg356998.html#new) based on the number of copies that are acquired and not sold -- which would also give players a reason to hang onto Relics. I've said before that if there is no reason not to sell Relics, then the slots should just give electrum instead of a card (which they clearly can do, since they give electrum for matching the first two reels).

[RavingRabbid]

First, a nymph at the beginning and I argue intermediate stages of development for any player is "blown out of proportion" or "hyped up". In my opinion, the value of the elctrum to get other useful cards outweighs the value of any one nymph.

I can't find a single person that sold a nymph and didn't later regret it.

Kael-