Do stuff with your extra electrum! Buy more pets at petco!

[TimerClock14]

This is just a random idea I had after thinking about what to do after I upgraded all of my cards and had a full set.

With all that extra electrum you could go to "petco" and "buy" a pet. Which is basically buying a card from the bazaar, but you get it as an oracle pet instead (without the oracle spin)

Now there'd be sever nerfbatting on this, like make it x5 the cost of the bazaar value.

[TheCrazyMango]

so half an upgrade for 12 damage a turn against an FG?! im in

[TimerClock14]

so half an upgrade for 12 damage a turn against an FG?! im in

lolwut

[icecoldbro]

so half an upgrade for 12 damage a turn against an FG?! im in

lolwut

He means Crimson Dragon.
Its bazaar cost is 107 or so, so around half an upgraded sold card for it.
Its damage is 12, figure out the rest.

[TimerClock14]

so half an upgrade for 12 damage a turn against an FG?! im in

lolwut

He means Crimson Dragon.
Its bazaar cost is 107 or so, so around half an upgraded sold card for it.
Its damage is 12, figure out the rest.

well, the point is to get rid of .....

[Toimu13]

so half an upgrade for 12 damage a turn against an FG?! im in

lolwut

He means Crimson Dragon.
Its bazaar cost is 107 or so, so around half an upgraded sold card for it.
Its damage is 12, figure out the rest.

well, the point is to get rid of .....

But everyone would do it, not just vets.  I could see people paying like 10k for an extra Spin with the Oracle.

[TimerClock14]

so half an upgrade for 12 damage a turn against an FG?! im in

lolwut

He means Crimson Dragon.
Its bazaar cost is 107 or so, so around half an upgraded sold card for it.
Its damage is 12, figure out the rest.

well, the point is to get rid of .....

But everyone would do it, not just vets.  I could see people paying like 10k for an extra Spin with the Oracle.

Not an extra spin. You just get to buy one pet, like you would get from the oracle spin, for five times the bazaar price.

[BluePriest]

so it lasts for 3 non pvp games like the oracle as well then?

I wouldnt like it if that was the case as it is too expensive. I know, I know "the point is to get rid of money" but this change wold effect such a small amount of the player base. It needs to be accessible to vets and newbs alike, while not draining the newbs funds.

[TimerClock14]

so it lasts for 3 non pvp games like the oracle as well then?

I wouldnt like it if that was the case as it is too expensive. I know, I know "the point is to get rid of money" but this change wold effect such a small amount of the player base. It needs to be accessible to vets and newbs alike, while not draining the newbs funds.

If that were to happen, then the entire metagame would be changed, and I'm not sure if it would change in a "good" way.

[BluePriest]

so it lasts for 3 non pvp games like the oracle as well then?

I wouldnt like it if that was the case as it is too expensive. I know, I know "the point is to get rid of money" but this change wold effect such a small amount of the player base. It needs to be accessible to vets and newbs alike, while not draining the newbs funds.

If that were to happen, then the entire metagame would be changed, and I'm not sure if it would change in a "good" way.

dont get me wrong, it couldnt be dirt cheap. Perhaps just 3x the amount, or perhaps leave it at 5x but it caps at say 300.
Theres lots of ways this could be done so that it relates to the users experience. You could even have the amount of time they stay with you directlly related to your score. Theres plenty of thins. A change that would just effect a very small (id be willing to guess less than 5% of the player base) wouldnt be good though.

[TimerClock14]

so it lasts for 3 non pvp games like the oracle as well then?

I wouldnt like it if that was the case as it is too expensive. I know, I know "the point is to get rid of money" but this change wold effect such a small amount of the player base. It needs to be accessible to vets and newbs alike, while not draining the newbs funds.

If that were to happen, then the entire metagame would be changed, and I'm not sure if it would change in a "good" way.

dont get me wrong, it couldnt be dirt cheap. Perhaps just 3x the amount, or perhaps leave it at 5x but it caps at say 300.
Theres lots of ways this could be done so that it relates to the users experience. You could even have the amount of time they stay with you directlly related to your score. Theres plenty of thins. A change that would just effect a very small (id be willing to guess less than 5% of the player base) wouldnt be good though.

perhaps....It would ease up the grind as well, especially for the newer players

The 300 cap sounds good, and the number of turns you have it for will be your score divided by X; where X is a number we need to figure out.

[RagingAlien]

how about for every 500 score, minimum 1, you get one battle with a pet? after 3 battles, increases to 1000, after another 3, to 1500, and so it goes. vets could have long-lasting pets, newbs could have 1-match/2-match pets, etc. maybe cap it at 10 so people with those ridiculous 5mil score don't have pets for a year.