Secret War sections made public after a team gets eliminated

[PuppyChow]

SG, what if we wanted to go above and beyond the call of duty in strategy and such and made more topics than just your "general" ones? Shouldn't we be allowed to make more strategy topics to help us?

I like union's idea of the master choosing one other person that can make topics.

[Scaredgirl]

SG, what if we wanted to go above and beyond the call of duty in strategy and such and made more topics than just your "general" ones? Shouldn't we be allowed to make more strategy topics to help us?

Yes, you are right. After thinking about this some more, topic starting should not be limited because these forums should be about posting as much as you like. Idea behind limiting posting is only to prevent chaos but we have a way round that.

I think the best solution would be to tell Masters to start these compulsory sticky threads. All teams would have these same "important" sticky threads to help organizers. On top of this, players could start any (non-sticky) topics they want.

[homoaddictus]

Wow, this is a great idea. Finally, those of us who isn't in war 1 can get an insider feel of the war experience.

[tyranim]

it was because of this revealing thing that i decided to go with code names for certain strategies for the next war, assuming that the losing teams' war room is released to the public after their defeat in the next war

[918273645]

- bashing other teams
- bashing other players

OH FUC-

I lol'ed.