Gamblers

[mathman101]

I'm In

[eaglgenes101]

Me 2

[RavingRabbid]

Onizuka	100
Kuroaitou	100
RootRanger	100
plastiqe	100
Calindu	100
Helston	89
PlayerOa	88
kev	87
Jenkar	80
Justaburd	74
Laxadarap	74
UnderneathTheLens	73
Elbirn	70
Annele	69
qwerter	69
Regyptic	68
Rutarete	67
ji412jo	52
whatif	42
mathman101	42
Jocko	30
Vineroz	23
TheAccuso	22
Arthanasios	18
shadow303	17
Spielkind	12
ddevans96	5

No time left in Round 2.

Remember to have yer PM title contain GAMBLERS - ROUND 2 (not necessarily capsed).

Sorry, Oni. Random.org decided to kill you out.

[pikachufan2164]

inb4 Oni blames RNG ಠ_ಠ

[ARTHANASIOS]

GAMBLERS - ROUND 2 (not necessarily capsed).

What? If CAPS isn't a neccessity in this life then what it is?

[Laxadarap]

Going 100.

[Mort]

I'm suprised that no-one chose 99 

[Rutarete]

I'm suprised that no-one chose 99 

That's the psychological fun of it

[Vineroz]

Going 100.

Screw RNG. Going 100 as well.

[Helston]

Hang on, as it is this game looks a little broken. If multiple people pick 100 (which DID happen and might very well happen again), and at least one person doesn't, the best option is to pick 100. Admittedly this isn't THAT big a problem at the moment, because the four leaders might back down, and leave one person picking 100, but if this game were to be repeated you would essentially see nothing but 100s in the first round, and anyone who didn't pick it would be losing it.

This game is a much less of a multiplayer game than it is a puzzle with a solution (based on how many people pick that solution).

With all that said I'm still in a solid 5th place, so prepare to die, everyone else.

[ddevans96]

lolfive.

[ARTHANASIOS]

Problem is, 300 points are very easy to be reached (just choose 100 three times in a row and don't be RNG-killed). Maybe a limit of 500,700 ot 1000 could be better (on the other hand, it might take forever).