Cal - I really don't like the way he goes to policy, and bad play lynch approach in order to vote me, but reading over the stuff in his posts so far it actually reads like he really just believes that is a fair set of reasons to lynch a player (they aren't by the way). Given his replies and vote/etc. with Sub I really don't see any w/w with Sub (who is a strong scumread for me right now).
I'm not pushing to policy lynch you, I just said that if it were almost anyone else, they would get policy lynched for the play.
Here's my read list
vv
serp, moe - No reason to not believe that
v
TorB - He plays very similar to the way he played last mafia, where he flipped town, very methodical and slow, looking at hard evidence
MW - Again, he plays in a very similar fashion to the way he played town
n+
kae - Helpful to the town, plays as I would expect him to play
n
Ge0 - Not much content, don't see why others consider him suspicious though
Annele, ian, DC, kdz, shock - Have no reads on them really
n-
andretimpa - Very low content, but comes up more suspicious than others to me
Linkcat - I am really unsure how to read him, but I remember he did the same strategy when he flipped mafia too - quickly giving ideas for people to vote on to see whom are other people ok to lynch
Sub - I don't really know tbh, he plays strange, very unusual. I don't like the idea of not lynching rob/Link if they do something suspect, as it reinforces an idea that we rely on them to solve and we are ok to lose if they are mafia. However, his last few posts actually feel genuine. He would have been w before the few posts about broken rules
rob - Gives me a weird vibe all around, a big part of that is the Oty play, which makes more sense as Fate Egg, but I still don't like
w
ww