Elements Mafia 72 - by Ginyu

[dawn to dusk]

Considering you are mafia, why would you kill moe?
Who are your 3 ideal mafia teammates?
Do you like playing as mafia or town?

- Probably a safety kill, with no knowledge of how many docs are in the game, a lot of the high-profile suspects would be protected. Sub looked pretty scummy, so obviously a bad NK target, Shock could easily detriment his own game, and similar stuff can be said about others

- Probs Shock, because I'm curious to how he would play, w3, because after deadchat from last mafia I can tell that he's more than competent, and Ian, since he's super decent at the game, and I wouldn't mind playing with him at all

- They both have merits, mafia is more stressful than town since you're constantly worried of getting caught, but you have more information, so there is definitely an appeal there

[dawn to dusk]

Lmao, people are actually voting w3? As hilarious as it would be to lynch him Day 1 when he wanted to play so badly, I don't think that's the right move. I change my vote to Espi, because lynching him Day 1 would also be hilarious and it might actually go through. Actually nevermind, we need to keep the talkative people alive. Let's lynch a quiet person, like JCJ. He said he'd be inactive, and the meme factor is high. Yeah, I vote for JCJ.

shockcannon (1) - Annele
dawn to dusk (2) - PlayerOa, Submachine
worldwideweb3 (2) - iancudorinmarian, MasterWalks
TheonlyrealBeef (1) - Espithel
Espithel (3) - Mobian, Linkcat, dawn to dusk
Mobian (1) -worldwideweb3

I'm pretty bad at early votes, but I want to break the tie. w3 is a soft lean town for me atm so I don't want to vote for him

[Submachine]

As for the 3 part question, I would throw for town if it meant next game I could be mafia because mafia rhymes with elbillug.

I would like to call out that Shock is currently breaking Rule 6 of General Mafia Rules.

"6. All players' actions should be primarily motivated by winning the game. Throwing the game or outing your teammates for no strategic value is not allowed."

He is intentionally encouraging a lynch on him to then reveal Town, just to prepare for his big debut when he actually rolls Mafia in a future game.

[MasterWalks]

As for the 3 part question, I would throw for town if it meant next game I could be mafia because mafia rhymes with elbillug.

I would like to call out that Shock is currently breaking Rule 6 of General Mafia Rules.

"6. All players' actions should be primarily motivated by winning the game. Throwing the game or outing your teammates for no strategic value is not allowed."

He is intentionally encouraging a lynch on him to then reveal Town, just to prepare for his big debut when he actually rolls Mafia in a future game.

I would like to translate for shock: " I don't have any reads."

Maybe he's breaking the rules but you hosted a game where shock played and he was much worse that game. I'm not trying to defend him but this is not a reason to quote this rule.

[TheonlyrealBeef]

Almost the entire post was sarcasm, yet you take that one line out of context and interpret it as a rule break?

elbillug reverses into gullible, if it was not obvious.

[Submachine]

Maybe he's breaking the rules but you hosted a game where shock played and he was much worse that game. I'm not trying to defend him but this is not a reason to quote this rule.

Yeah, I hosted a game where he also stated during the early phases that he would throw the game just to prepare for his big debut as a Mafia in a future game. It was only later when he started taking the game seriously.

This is not out of place though. A gamethrowing shock is definitely Town, but a very annoying one.

[Submachine]

This is not out of place though. A gamethrowing shock is definitely Town, but a very annoying one.

EBWOP: *This accusation is not out place

I did not mean that for shock's current playstyle.

[iancudorinmarian]

Sub sounds like the kind of cop that suspeds your driving license for driving 51 km/h in a 50 limit zone.

Anyway, stil deciding on my vote.

[Linkcat]

Sub being Sub again, calm down bro, he's not breaking any rules.

[Linkcat]

Lmao, people are actually voting w3? As hilarious as it would be to lynch him Day 1 when he wanted to play so badly, I don't think that's the right move. I change my vote to Espi, because lynching him Day 1 would also be hilarious and it might actually go through. Actually nevermind, we need to keep the talkative people alive. Let's lynch a quiet person, like JCJ. He said he'd be inactive, and the meme factor is high. Yeah, I vote for JCJ.

shockcannon (1) - Annele
dawn to dusk (2) - PlayerOa, Submachine
worldwideweb3 (2) - iancudorinmarian, MasterWalks
TheonlyrealBeef (1) - Espithel
Espithel (3) - Mobian, Linkcat, dawn to dusk
Mobian (1) -worldwideweb3

I'm pretty bad at early votes, but I want to break the tie. w3 is a soft lean town for me atm so I don't want to vote for him

You misread my post, I voted for JCJ. You breaking the tie here is very uncharacteristic of you, so I am actually changing my vote again.

shockcannon (1) - Annele
dawn to dusk (3) - PlayerOa, Submachine, Linkcat
worldwideweb3 (2) - iancudorinmarian, MasterWalks
TheonlyrealBeef (1) - Espithel
Espithel (2) - Mobian, dawn to dusk
Mobian (1) -worldwideweb3

[dawn to dusk]

Oh my bad, I saw that you were voting Espi and changed my vote like that
Why is me breaking a tie uncharacteristic?

[dawn to dusk]

Ok so I just realised that tied lynch means no lynch occurs, rather than a random lynch. Since I thought the choice was 66% unfavourable for what I believed, that's why I broke the tie

shockcannon (1) - Annele
dawn to dusk (3) - PlayerOa, Submachine, Linkcat
worldwideweb3 (2) - iancudorinmarian, MasterWalks
TheonlyrealBeef (1) - Espithel
Espithel (1) - Mobian
Mobian (1) -worldwideweb3

Back to protecting Graboid's identity