Explain when you arrived at those reads on those players. Some of them have not posted since the end of Day 0 -- if you FOS somebody now but they haven't done anything since during Day 0 then why not voting them Day 0 for the same stuff you FOS them over now??
Link: d0
Luna/Coffee: d0
the group: n1
I'm not in the business of being hasty on a FD lynch. I don't have any issues with the votes for Sub and Sol but I was certainly not going to add votes to the pile myself. If I did so, it would have been on Link, and that would have made a three-way tie at the time, which would just muddied the vote even more.
I really think this is just different FD philosophies but I do understand why you're scumreading me and questioning me.
For what it's worth I've reread and I no longer have a viable scumread on Lunaris. She's back to neutral in my view.
Actions speak louder than words, so regardless what people are saying about their reasonings behind moving to the no lynch the fact that they moved to no lynch puts them towards suspicion on my list.
Of those 4 (Linkcat, worldwideweb3, Lunaris, Submachine), I think at least 1 of them is mafia (possibly 2). Both www3 and Sub are drawing attention towards themselves by posting lots and Luna and Link have been fairly quiet not drawing attention to themselves. I think both could be tactics of at least one mafia member, but unsure if these are tactics or just the way these player play as it has been a while since I last played a mafia.
Not sure I have an actually townsread list yet. but those four are somewhere on the wolfie side of neutral in my eyes.(but not sure how scummy yet)
While I didn't explicitly vote NL, I'm unsure why I'm not in that group as well given my stance. Do you see me as neutral, then, or also as slightly scum?
Hi. I'm back. What's up?
The collective blood pressure of a group of 18 forum members, I imagine.
