Elements Mafia 68 - by Kuroaitou

[rob77dp]

The "no lynch is ok because it avoids the town being lynched which is mathematically more likely than lynching scum" needs to S T O P. the basic mechanics of mafia games is such that town has LOST if the game is ever more non town than town, right? If it is say 6 town and 7 scum -- 'Hey, we can finally have better than 50/50 to lynch scum !' 'oh wait now we don't have enough votes to lynch scum!'

Seriously, no lynching is ridiculous there. No lynch mechanic is for specific purposes such as mylo when no solid leads remain to ensure another night and day phase to figure the game out.

[rob77dp]

I agree with Ian - anyone ok with no lynch yesterday should always be advocating for vigilantes (Hitman) to holster and not shoot.

/still cannot believe you lot think no lynch was the right move

[worldwideweb3]

The "no lynch is ok because it avoids the town being lynched which is mathematically more likely than lynching scum" needs to S T O P. the basic mechanics of mafia games is such that town has LOST if the game is ever more non town than town, right? If it is say 6 town and 7 scum -- 'Hey, we can finally have better than 50/50 to lynch scum !' 'oh wait now we don't have enough votes to lynch scum!'

Seriously, no lynching is ridiculous there. No lynch mechanic is for specific purposes such as mylo when no solid leads remain to ensure another night and day phase to figure the game out.

What you dont get is that people said no lynching on day 0 , when theres no info, is fine.

[iancudorinmarian]

If vigilantes decide to kill frequently, it might save time if they decided to shoot a person, who other people would be too distracted with if said person would stay alive. Reasoning is that while the majority focuses on ONE person, everyone else slips under the radar and the attention of the players is not spreaded. (but that doesn't mean you should shoot me >_< I'm just sharing ideas)

Sounds to me like you're trying to suggest vigilantes to start shooting.

[iancudorinmarian]

Also, there's no such thing as "imaginary statements", just interpretation.

[iancudorinmarian]

7/18=38.88%

You wanted at least 30%. Here's even more than that.

[rob77dp]

7/18=38.88%

You wanted at least 30%. Here's even more than that.

plus, one.

I'm never Convinced here that no lynch was the right move. Getting in from that, it is actually laughable that you think vigilantes tonight have somehow magically better is odd hitting scum than the lynch did. They're use one reason but outer only affects it every so slightly and it ISN'T the reason you're using so far.

Why is vig'ing lurkers ok to you, Sub, but lynching day 0 want??

[JonathanCrazyJ]

literally explained why no lynch is bad so many times it's not even funny

[JonathanCrazyJ]

I don't believe in coincidences. Either rob OR ian OR DC OR JCJ must be mafia. Their combined forces push me down so hard, that one of them has to be an agitator.

For everyone who didn't answer yet:

- Healers: Is it worth for them to keep targeting the same person consistently to eventually deter A nightkill or is it more worth to adapt to the previous day's towntells and thus switch it up every night?
- Investigators: Should they investigate someone loud or someone quiet?
- Town-aligned killers (vigilantes): Should they kill as often as possible or should they abstain from random shots?

or people are going for you because you continually do irritating or suspect things.

Why even mention vigilante shooting? saying "IF you do this, do it like this" validates the idea of doing it at all, which is a terrible idea

[Solaris]

No, I'm pissed now. Ian seriously cannot read and I'm the one who suffers because of it. Even himself once admitted he sucks at this, why are we listening to him?

so you're mad because someone didn't interpret your words at face value in a game that depends on reading between the lines and drawing conclusions? sorry but I'm not seeing the logic here

[iancudorinmarian]

YOU DO REALIZE STATISTICALLY 1 IN 3 IS THE SAME AS 3 IN 9, DON'T YOU???

How the heck are we ever supposed to reach 1 in 3?

Sub, you said yourself you're very rusty, you're even more rusty than me. Why should we listen to YOU then? Same logic applies here.

[iancudorinmarian]

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa