Elements Mafia 68 - by Kuroaitou

[UTAlan]

Agree with rob here. Not sure if I get a scum read out of not-voting just yet, but it's not giving me a town-read for sure. Would love for you to vote now, knowing you can change your vote later if needed.

[worldwideweb3]

Thanks dd.

@w3 You say rob and Sol are scum reads, but you don't have a vote down. Why not?

I generally find it scummy to shade someone without voting, as it is a way for mafia to get town credit without having to actually vote on their teammate.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

I'm waiting to see what others have to say, and also deciding which one of the two is more scummy (got my trinity finals in half an hour too, so yh)

Let me get this straight.

You are planning to sit back and just follow the thread to see if Sol or I are the most scummy and deserving of your vote? If you think we're both scummy I would more often expect a town-player in that position to vote one of them (commonly, the lower voting total at the time for helping setup later vote-totals/placement analysis) and THEN follow along and interrogate those two players to decide who to END UP voting as the scummiest of the two.

That's your approach, not mine.

[UTAlan]

I dont see any other reason for him to view your profile apart from exchanging pms with his fellow mafia partner.

Going through post history? Maybe trying to look for breadcrumbs or any hints as to whether he's Intel or what his role is?

On a completely different note, are you alive link? And can others who havent posted since nk also comment?

Fasho agree, here. This feels almost like the last day of mafia 66, with the 3 of us dominating conversation.

[UTAlan]

Also, looking at someone's profile could be unrelated to mafia.

[worldwideweb3]

Also, looking at someone's profile could be unrelated to mafia.

Not when espi is doing it. He hasnt got anything better to do. #burn

[rob77dp]

Spoiler for www3 stating a reason for scum-reading Sol:

@rob

Espi was rather nice to you. After seeing your and espi's interaction (and seeing how you two voted on diff wagons too), i would funnily enough suspect you as mafia.
Sola is also on my mafia list atm.

First, thanks for putting that reply out there, www3. Second, my responses:

* He was a Criminal being town-read by me... of course he was nice to me. Are you scum-reading anyone else based on them being nice to each other and not voting the same player?

* What has you scum-reading Solaris right now?

* Nothing else from your commentary-list changes with Espithel's night death?

<had this typed up but lost it in my sea of open tabs without clicking "Post">

Defends sola's left vote (and links), puts vote on sub at 4-4. Either he did that to stay away from a fellow mafia partner, or to protect a fellow mafia partner, or just because he wanted sub dead more.

What?!?? I tried a few times and could not noodle-through what you're trying to state here. Can you clarify please?

Espi defended sola's and link's self vote. He voted on sub when sola and sub were tied (to either protect sola, or to vote away from his mafia partner).

Spoiler for rob having already had that exact same read/reaction:

dawn to dusk (1) - iancudorinmarian
Solaris (4) - Solaris, Submachine, rob77dp, worldwideweb3
ddevans96 (1) - fabian771
Submachine (5) - DoubleCapitals, Killsdazombies, Coffeeditto, JonathanCrazyJ, Espithel
Linkcat (1) - Linkcat
mathman101 (1) - ddevans96


Can't be bothered to explain when it's going to require 10 more presses of the post buttons
Invisitext is cancer, using it automatically makes you filth

REALLY telling vote here, perhaps.

Espithel putting Sub above the recently tied Solaris and mentioning he didn't want to explain... explaining has nothing to do with how many clicks of "Submit" you have to do, either.

Also, almost clearing of Sub not being a Criminal.

1. You point out Espi's vote on Sub looks bad for Sol.
2. I am already scum-reading Solaris part of which is for that same thing that I already pointed out.
3. You are scum-reading me.
4. You are scum-reading Solaris.
5. ?You think I am bussing Solaris right now?!?

[rob77dp]

@rob

Espi was rather nice to you. After seeing your and espi's interaction (and seeing how you two voted on diff wagons too), i would funnily enough suspect you as mafia.
Sola is also on my mafia list atm.

First, thanks for putting that reply out there, www3. Second, my responses:

* He was a Criminal being town-read by me... of course he was nice to me. Are you scum-reading anyone else based on them being nice to each other and not voting the same player?

* What has you scum-reading Solaris right now?

* Nothing else from your commentary-list changes with Espithel's night death?

<had this typed up but lost it in my sea of open tabs without clicking "Post">

Defends sola's left vote (and links), puts vote on sub at 4-4. Either he did that to stay away from a fellow mafia partner, or to protect a fellow mafia partner, or just because he wanted sub dead more.

Also, rob. He (espi) was vieing your profile. A town wouldnt really be doing that.

mafia*, not town

So you're after-the-fact scum-reading Espithel for your seeing in the /who that he was viewing my profile? 0.o I find it totally NAI (not alignment indicative) whether another player is viewing people's forum profiles. Can you walk me through how you're finding that scummy (you stated it was scummy for Espithel to do it -- would you find that scummy of other players too)?

I dont see any other reason for him to view your profile apart from exchanging pms with his fellow mafia partner.

On a completely different note, are you alive link? And can others who havent posted since nk also comment?

Oh 100% incorrect. If we were scum partners he would not be forum PM-ing me. He would be typing to me in TPad or PiratePad or whatever is set up for scum to talk to each other. Now you're just making things up.

[worldwideweb3]

@rob

Espi was rather nice to you. After seeing your and espi's interaction (and seeing how you two voted on diff wagons too), i would funnily enough suspect you as mafia.
Sola is also on my mafia list atm.

First, thanks for putting that reply out there, www3. Second, my responses:

* He was a Criminal being town-read by me... of course he was nice to me. Are you scum-reading anyone else based on them being nice to each other and not voting the same player?

* What has you scum-reading Solaris right now?

* Nothing else from your commentary-list changes with Espithel's night death?

<had this typed up but lost it in my sea of open tabs without clicking "Post">

Defends sola's left vote (and links), puts vote on sub at 4-4. Either he did that to stay away from a fellow mafia partner, or to protect a fellow mafia partner, or just because he wanted sub dead more.

Also, rob. He (espi) was vieing your profile. A town wouldnt really be doing that.

mafia*, not town

So you're after-the-fact scum-reading Espithel for your seeing in the /who that he was viewing my profile? 0.o I find it totally NAI (not alignment indicative) whether another player is viewing people's forum profiles. Can you walk me through how you're finding that scummy (you stated it was scummy for Espithel to do it -- would you find that scummy of other players too)?

I dont see any other reason for him to view your profile apart from exchanging pms with his fellow mafia partner.

On a completely different note, are you alive link? And can others who havent posted since nk also comment?

Oh 100% incorrect. If we were scum partners he would not be forum PM-ing me. He would be typing to me in TPad or PiratePad or whatever is set up for scum to talk to each other. Now you're just making things up.

As a mafia, i have forum pmed fellow mafia players before.

[worldwideweb3]

Spoiler for www3 stating a reason for scum-reading Sol:

@rob

Espi was rather nice to you. After seeing your and espi's interaction (and seeing how you two voted on diff wagons too), i would funnily enough suspect you as mafia.
Sola is also on my mafia list atm.

First, thanks for putting that reply out there, www3. Second, my responses:

* He was a Criminal being town-read by me... of course he was nice to me. Are you scum-reading anyone else based on them being nice to each other and not voting the same player?

* What has you scum-reading Solaris right now?

* Nothing else from your commentary-list changes with Espithel's night death?

<had this typed up but lost it in my sea of open tabs without clicking "Post">

Defends sola's left vote (and links), puts vote on sub at 4-4. Either he did that to stay away from a fellow mafia partner, or to protect a fellow mafia partner, or just because he wanted sub dead more.

What?!?? I tried a few times and could not noodle-through what you're trying to state here. Can you clarify please?

Espi defended sola's and link's self vote. He voted on sub when sola and sub were tied (to either protect sola, or to vote away from his mafia partner).

Spoiler for rob having already had that exact same read/reaction:

dawn to dusk (1) - iancudorinmarian
Solaris (4) - Solaris, Submachine, rob77dp, worldwideweb3
ddevans96 (1) - fabian771
Submachine (5) - DoubleCapitals, Killsdazombies, Coffeeditto, JonathanCrazyJ, Espithel
Linkcat (1) - Linkcat
mathman101 (1) - ddevans96


Can't be bothered to explain when it's going to require 10 more presses of the post buttons
Invisitext is cancer, using it automatically makes you filth

REALLY telling vote here, perhaps.

Espithel putting Sub above the recently tied Solaris and mentioning he didn't want to explain... explaining has nothing to do with how many clicks of "Submit" you have to do, either.

Also, almost clearing of Sub not being a Criminal.

1. You point out Espi's vote on Sub looks bad for Sol.
2. I am already scum-reading Solaris part of which is for that same thing that I already pointed out.
3. You are scum-reading me.
4. You are scum-reading Solaris.
5. ?You think I am bussing Solaris right now?!?

One of you is mafia, not both.

[rob77dp]

Spoiler for www3 stating a reason for scum-reading Sol:

@rob

Espi was rather nice to you. After seeing your and espi's interaction (and seeing how you two voted on diff wagons too), i would funnily enough suspect you as mafia.
Sola is also on my mafia list atm.

First, thanks for putting that reply out there, www3. Second, my responses:

* He was a Criminal being town-read by me... of course he was nice to me. Are you scum-reading anyone else based on them being nice to each other and not voting the same player?

* What has you scum-reading Solaris right now?

* Nothing else from your commentary-list changes with Espithel's night death?

<had this typed up but lost it in my sea of open tabs without clicking "Post">

Defends sola's left vote (and links), puts vote on sub at 4-4. Either he did that to stay away from a fellow mafia partner, or to protect a fellow mafia partner, or just because he wanted sub dead more.

What?!?? I tried a few times and could not noodle-through what you're trying to state here. Can you clarify please?

Espi defended sola's and link's self vote. He voted on sub when sola and sub were tied (to either protect sola, or to vote away from his mafia partner).

Spoiler for rob having already had that exact same read/reaction:

dawn to dusk (1) - iancudorinmarian
Solaris (4) - Solaris, Submachine, rob77dp, worldwideweb3
ddevans96 (1) - fabian771
Submachine (5) - DoubleCapitals, Killsdazombies, Coffeeditto, JonathanCrazyJ, Espithel
Linkcat (1) - Linkcat
mathman101 (1) - ddevans96


Can't be bothered to explain when it's going to require 10 more presses of the post buttons
Invisitext is cancer, using it automatically makes you filth

REALLY telling vote here, perhaps.

Espithel putting Sub above the recently tied Solaris and mentioning he didn't want to explain... explaining has nothing to do with how many clicks of "Submit" you have to do, either.

Also, almost clearing of Sub not being a Criminal.

1. You point out Espi's vote on Sub looks bad for Sol.
2. I am already scum-reading Solaris part of which is for that same thing that I already pointed out.
3. You are scum-reading me.
4. You are scum-reading Solaris.
5. ?You think I am bussing Solaris right now?!?

One of you is mafia, not both.

Interesting - please help us all understand some more with a bit of explanation about how you developed your "not w/w" (or in this game, not-Criminal/Criminal) read on Sol and I. Much appreciated.

[worldwideweb3]

Spoiler for www3 stating a reason for scum-reading Sol:

@rob

Espi was rather nice to you. After seeing your and espi's interaction (and seeing how you two voted on diff wagons too), i would funnily enough suspect you as mafia.
Sola is also on my mafia list atm.

First, thanks for putting that reply out there, www3. Second, my responses:

* He was a Criminal being town-read by me... of course he was nice to me. Are you scum-reading anyone else based on them being nice to each other and not voting the same player?

* What has you scum-reading Solaris right now?

* Nothing else from your commentary-list changes with Espithel's night death?

<had this typed up but lost it in my sea of open tabs without clicking "Post">

Defends sola's left vote (and links), puts vote on sub at 4-4. Either he did that to stay away from a fellow mafia partner, or to protect a fellow mafia partner, or just because he wanted sub dead more.

What?!?? I tried a few times and could not noodle-through what you're trying to state here. Can you clarify please?

Espi defended sola's and link's self vote. He voted on sub when sola and sub were tied (to either protect sola, or to vote away from his mafia partner).

Spoiler for rob having already had that exact same read/reaction:

dawn to dusk (1) - iancudorinmarian
Solaris (4) - Solaris, Submachine, rob77dp, worldwideweb3
ddevans96 (1) - fabian771
Submachine (5) - DoubleCapitals, Killsdazombies, Coffeeditto, JonathanCrazyJ, Espithel
Linkcat (1) - Linkcat
mathman101 (1) - ddevans96


Can't be bothered to explain when it's going to require 10 more presses of the post buttons
Invisitext is cancer, using it automatically makes you filth

REALLY telling vote here, perhaps.

Espithel putting Sub above the recently tied Solaris and mentioning he didn't want to explain... explaining has nothing to do with how many clicks of "Submit" you have to do, either.

Also, almost clearing of Sub not being a Criminal.

1. You point out Espi's vote on Sub looks bad for Sol.
2. I am already scum-reading Solaris part of which is for that same thing that I already pointed out.
3. You are scum-reading me.
4. You are scum-reading Solaris.
5. ?You think I am bussing Solaris right now?!?

One of you is mafia, not both.

Interesting - please help us all understand some more with a bit of explanation about how you developed your "not w/w" (or in this game, not-Criminal/Criminal) read on Sol and I. Much appreciated.

Just how you explained. You are going against sol, and sol is voting on you. I dont expect that to be from mafia, when they are already 1 down.

[worldwideweb3]

Also, funny how someone who was against no lynch was mafia.