Elements Mafia 66 - by killsdazombies

[worldwideweb3]

lol. Why didnt you vote yourself when UT voted on you. Lol, pls rob, stop being silly here now.
Lol, doesnt matter if your "case" clears to you. That doesn't matter at all. And again, stop assuming if others think its clear or not. I dont even see a half decent case.

Checking deadline, we got about 6 hours. I'll vote in next couple if its still a draw (mainly waiting on what link has to say)

Get out with "why didn't vote [my]self". I can think of ONLY one case I would ever vote myself. This is not it. Self-voting is trashy play.

The case is WHY WOULD Mutineer!rob pre-soft (that is, indicate in the thread) upcoming night-shooting a player and then do it and then come out and claim it? NEVER happens. If I did that then I would have played scum-game of the year. Is that what you're saying you believe? That I softed/hinted an upcoming shot, then took that exact shot, and then claimed it in the thread as Mutineer?

fry.gif

If you are Zailor then I really think you need to re-evaluate your read on the game right now.

Mutineer(s) are among aa/www3/Link so if YOU (www3) are Zailor from your POV seriously consider a world of aa/Link together or separate as the bad guys.

You didnt claim you killed dawn. I said that you did.

I'll give you 30 minutes to re-read the game and my posts. I pre-hinted (softed) the kill on dawn before it ever happened.

Sorry but i'll not be re-reading the entire game. I have to leave really early tomorrow for my uni interview (for which im preparing atm). Hope you understand.

[rob77dp]

lol. Why didnt you vote yourself when UT voted on you. Lol, pls rob, stop being silly here now.
Lol, doesnt matter if your "case" clears to you. That doesn't matter at all. And again, stop assuming if others think its clear or not. I dont even see a half decent case.

Checking deadline, we got about 6 hours. I'll vote in next couple if its still a draw (mainly waiting on what link has to say)

Get out with "why didn't vote [my]self". I can think of ONLY one case I would ever vote myself. This is not it. Self-voting is trashy play.

The case is WHY WOULD Mutineer!rob pre-soft (that is, indicate in the thread) upcoming night-shooting a player and then do it and then come out and claim it? NEVER happens. If I did that then I would have played scum-game of the year. Is that what you're saying you believe? That I softed/hinted an upcoming shot, then took that exact shot, and then claimed it in the thread as Mutineer?

fry.gif

If you are Zailor then I really think you need to re-evaluate your read on the game right now.

Mutineer(s) are among aa/www3/Link so if YOU (www3) are Zailor from your POV seriously consider a world of aa/Link together or separate as the bad guys.

You didnt claim you killed dawn. I said that you did.

I'll give you 30 minutes to re-read the game and my posts. I pre-hinted (softed) the kill on dawn before it ever happened.

Sorry but i'll not be re-reading the entire game. I have to leave really early tomorrow for my uni interview (for which im preparing atm). Hope you understand.

I get it, and I figured this result.

Here it is for you: rob softing future shot on dawn

Or in quote form:

Good idea Link (I just read them again when I saw UTA only voting nothing else - found Scarred Sister)

dawn having yet to post ONCE since start of the game is a bad look for him.

Actually, voting/lynching a totally inactive 0-poster is something I find not very useful to town -- would be better if Cannoneer shot them. We would not know if they are Zailor or Mutineer (downside) while not having to worry about dawn anymore distracting from game solving (upside).

Unless UTA is faking it I find it almost spewing him clear as Zailor. It seems really long odds that a Mutineer would fake this and also long odds that a Mutineer was hit with it as an active poster. That's my take on that, at least.

Kuro (3) - Godisnowonline, antiaverage, rob77dp
UTAlan (1) - UTAlan

Kuro, get in here and play some more please?!?

[worldwideweb3]

hmm, ok, you said before killing him. I'll move my vote to anti for now, and try and re-read yours and link's stuff when i can. That claim doesn't, though, make you all clear. It removes one reason for my suspicion.

Linkcat (2) - rob77dp, antiaverage
antiaverage (2) - Linkcat, UTAlan, worldwideweb3

[UTAlan]

Linkcat (2) - rob77dp, antiaverage
antiaverage (3) - Linkcat, UTAlan, worldwideweb3

[rob77dp]

Linkcat (2) - rob77dp, antiaverage
antiaverage (3) - Linkcat, UTAlan, worldwideweb3

UTA - will you be here EOD? (1 = yes, 2 = no)

[UTAlan]

Linkcat (2) - rob77dp, antiaverage
antiaverage (3) - Linkcat, UTAlan, worldwideweb3

[rob77dp]

www3 -

What is the basis of your Zailor-read on Link right now which is strong enough you want to vote where he is and to wait for his singular opinion of game-state and where to vote?

[worldwideweb3]

www3 -

What is the basis of your Zailor-read on Link right now which is strong enough you want to vote where he is and to wait for his singular opinion of game-state and where to vote?

I'm not following link. I did say that you/anti were the mafia pair for me. But suspicion for you has slightly gone down, hence i changed my vote to anti. anti is more scummy than link atm, due to lack of contributions.

[rob77dp]

www3 -

What is the basis of your Zailor-read on Link right now which is strong enough you want to vote where he is and to wait for his singular opinion of game-state and where to vote?

I'm not following link. I did say that you/anti were the mafia pair for me. But suspicion for you has slightly gone down, hence i changed my vote to anti. anti is more scummy than link atm, due to lack of contributions.

If lack of contribution is scummy on its own then why are you not liking the shot on dawn?

[worldwideweb3]

www3 -

What is the basis of your Zailor-read on Link right now which is strong enough you want to vote where he is and to wait for his singular opinion of game-state and where to vote?

I'm not following link. I did say that you/anti were the mafia pair for me. But suspicion for you has slightly gone down, hence i changed my vote to anti. anti is more scummy than link atm, due to lack of contributions.

If lack of contribution is scummy on its own then why are you not liking the shot on dawn?

I should have pointed out lack of useful contribution. anti posts but not much is useful. Also, because there were people you thought to be more scummy than dawn, so that was another issue for me. I still dont agree that it was the right move, but i cant use that as a concrete case for you to be mafia as you did say it before using it.

[rob77dp]

www3 -

What is the basis of your Zailor-read on Link right now which is strong enough you want to vote where he is and to wait for his singular opinion of game-state and where to vote?

I'm not following link. I did say that you/anti were the mafia pair for me. But suspicion for you has slightly gone down, hence i changed my vote to anti. anti is more scummy than link atm, due to lack of contributions.

If lack of contribution is scummy on its own then why are you not liking the shot on dawn?

I should have pointed out lack of useful contribution. anti posts but not much is useful. Also, because there were people you thought to be more scummy than dawn, so that was another issue for me. I still dont agree that it was the right move, but i cant use that as a concrete case for you to be mafia as you did say it before using it.

Had I shot somebody more active than dawn (i.e. - anyone else) it would have meant we still have to deal with or somehow "read" a 0-poster later. Let's be clear here - I did not shoot dawn because I thought he was surely scum or that I was nailing a Mutineer. I may have shot a Mutineer. I mostly shot dawn to clear out a player that was going to almost surely hamper Zailor loyalty to solving the murder/case.

[rob77dp]

Also, you seem pretty convinced Link is going to come here before EOD (I'm not convinced of that...) and also that the case he makes is going to be against somebody that is not you...