Can I post my post-death post already?
I apologize for my complete lack of activity but I'm graduating next week and can't participate very well currently, I still request to be NOT modkilled.
The night is about to end and I'm not really sure if I will survive so I'll just post everything I can now. Even if I die it won't be a great loss role-wise. Perhaps I could've used it, but I don't want to. You also have no reason to trust me not being mafia so if you decide to lynch me as a neutral inactive/hidden mafia lynch next round I won't really mind, I'd have done the same by now. I'm actually surprised I made it this far.
Realistically, I believe that the last two mafias are d2d because he's always mafia and kirby because I have no idea I just believe it to be kirby. I have some suspects on JCJ and andre too, but I believe more in the other two.
Usually, I'd have tried to gain more reads by the time there were 13 players left, town has been doing fine enough anyways.
Spoiler for S-class posting:
What a lot of people may actually be thinking when they decide that math is real is something that goes along the lines of this; "When I see a bird, and then I see another bird, thus seeing both birds, I can conclude that 1 bird + 1 other bird = 2 birds." While this seems sound at first one must think about what is actually going on here.
POSSIBILITY 1: Math is being done somewhere in the Universe to allow these birds to be perceived at the same time.
POSSIBILITY 2: The human is observing both birds, and attempts to discern the two birds from each other, while still relating the two, using the concept of "count." And to properly use this "count," an extra, umbrella concept of "math" is being used to make sense of the two birds and their relation to one another. "1 + 1 = 2."
Possibility 1 doesn't really make sense. Even if mathematics were objective and empirical concepts; thus being "real," this does not mean that the two birds are intrinsically linked together by this concept. And due to what we know about Psychology, and Biology, humans make sense of the world using "concepts," something that may be real and may not be real.
Okay fair, I hear you saying. But what about physics? And using math to describe it's effects? Well, in order to understand this properly, we need to think about exactly what the debate REALLY is.
How, you may ask? Let's take a look at a watch. This watch isn't just any watch. It is THE watch. Every watch after this watch is simply a derivative version of this watch. This watch will PERFECTLY count how many plank frames (the smallest measurement of time) of the universe have passed.
Now. The question arises. Does this watch tell time, or does it DO time? This watch counts time down...perfectly. So it's easy for someone to take a look at it and say that it IS the heartbeat of the universe. It IS the loop in which the universe runs. This isn't unlike what realists think about mathematics. They think that because math (the watch) is so effective at solving problems of the universe and other fields within the universe (telling the time) that it isn't so unreasonable to assume that math (the watch) IS what the universe uses to actually make things work. (make time move forward) But, then again. This doesn't make so much sense when you think about it. The watch, no matter how perfectly it tells time, doesn't mean that it DOES time.
Similarly, mathematics, no matter how well it describes the universe, doesn't actually DO the universe. It is a tool, that was created by humans to help us understand the ever infinite nature of the universe. Even so, it doesn't actually matter if math is real or not. Humans creating math is genius in nature, and is totally one of our greatest, even if our most overlooked accomplishment.
