Elements Mafia 33 - By killsdazombies

[Terroking]

I'm not your pal, friend.

There's no point in lynching me; now that the doctor is dead, FG's get to kill me this round. They won't target Terro, though, because he's an FG. If Terro turns out to not be an FG, then you can lynch me. When one of us is not an FG, the other is. It's like, a law of mafia.

This is what I used to base my vote on, since I'm not a FG.

[Demagog]

It just occurred to me that if we are both using that rule in the same game, neither of us can be FGs because if one of us were, that person would be outing themselves because everyone would lynch him when the other one is found innocent... I think Terro and I just confirmed ourselves civilians.

[Helston]

It just occurred to me that if we are both using that rule in the same game, neither of us can be FGs because if one of us were, that person would be outing themselves because everyone would lynch him when the other one is found innocent... I think Terro and I just confirmed ourselves civilians.

Or a clever ruse by two Mafia members.

[Terroking]

It just occurred to me that if we are both using that rule in the same game, neither of us can be FGs because if one of us were, that person would be outing themselves because everyone would lynch him when the other one is found innocent... I think Terro and I just confirmed ourselves civilians.

What should we call it? The Dema-king continuum rule?

And, clearly, Helston, we have just proved with indisputable logic that we aren't FGs.

[Demagog]

Or Terrogog, both sound pretty good.

[Elbirn]

I completely fail to see how you two having that little back and forth proved anything. I think we should just lynch you both. 

[killsdazombies]

Qwerter was lynched Witness/Innocent

1world24 was murdered Seer/Warden

Well... Thats nice.

derpderpP

[Demagog]

Why would an FG ever bring attention to himself? That's just asking to lose.

We should lynch you for your lack of understanding of logic and strategy. /s

We better lynch FG's soon. Desperate times call for desperate measures. Whoever was in an alliance with 1world, PM me.

My suspicions: RootRanger, majofa, Elbirn, mathman101, Fippe94, Helston

The first five were quick to bandwagon, Helston is voting against them, which could be a ruse to give him credibility if the others are lynched, and root changed his vote to me when it would have no affect on anything.

Could we get a list of people that don't vote each round?

[Elbirn]

Two FG's bringing attention to themselves in an elaborate ploy to make themselves appear to be not FG's would be a good reason. Even if the actions of you two would suggest a good possibility of not being FG's (which I think is poppycock), there is nothing definitive about it, thus it's entirely reasonable for me to say that "Hey, this doesn't prove jack sheit." Your attempt to sound clueless and ignorant ("Wow i didn't even know this game was still going, the forums are up? golly gee willikers") followed by your cohort immediately voting for you? I don't like it. I'm also wary of you trying to find the innocents who were allied with 1world when you yourself aren't confirmed civ, seems like an obvious attempt by an FG to gather intel and sow chaos amongst the townies. 

Demagog (1) - Elbirn

[majofa]

Demagog (2) - Elbirn, majofa

[Demagog]

You guys do know that when I'm proven innocent, you're all dying next, right?

Demagog (2) - Elbirn, majofa
majofa (1) - Demagog

More likely that an FG would join a bandwagon than start it, in my opinion.

[ddevans96]

The first five were quick to bandwagon.

Define quick. Why is Fippe's vote considered quick to you, but not xyan's? 20 minutes is basically nothing as far as time goes.