Well since I'm not mafia, apparently I'm just playing poorly, but I honestly don't see that as that much of a convincing argument. For example, when the issue arose, I didn't see a major problem with what he was saying, and I feel like it didn't really affect anybody. Hence, mafia or civies wouldn't really have an reason to comment on or be angry about it except for the morals of the game. I see it is Jocko just having a bit of a different opinion than Majofa. I do too, the information didn't affect anybody, so it doesn't matter if he said it. That is just personal opinion though, and I do realize the concept.
Secondly, I don't see anywhere in that conversation that Jocko was angry at Majofa for pointing that out. It looks like he was more defending Elbirn than anything, in other words, He was defending the person who let information lead. It was actually Majofa who was saying that information should not be let out. I really don't see why you are picking on Jocko instead of Majofa. Even so, I still don't think that was based on the game, just the morals of mafia, and I am not planning on voting on either of them, it's pretty much just a random lynch imo.