Elements Mafia - 18 - By Demagog

[TheIdioticIdiot]

So you're telling me to first explain a someone else's actions (a false god's, to boot!), as if I would know when everyone else doesn't?

Well, I have nothing to say, as you already hinted in your post.

You asked in the PM why Dragoon1140 said I was a fallen elf after he traded. You claimed this was suspicious because I said I mutated myself in the first round.

And I replied with "I've always been a liar", which obviously means that I've been a liar since I was mutated and have no clue what you're talking about. Why is it so hard to believe that Dragoon1140 didn't trade me? That he started out as the False God's original fallen elf, or that he traded the False God's original fallen elf?

You seemed trustworthy after successfully calling out Dragoon1140, but your reoccurring blood-thirst really makes me wonder if Dragoon1140's lynching was the result of careful planning or just luck. In the eyes of the people not in your little alliance, you are becoming more and more suspicious.

by saying that I am suspicious, DOESN'T help your cause...

[Pineapple]

You are only confirmed in the eyes of 3 people: The seer, the gambler, and yourself. I'm quite surprised no one else has challenged you yet. Could it be because you're telling everyone else something? If you have never trusted me, why should I expect you to trust me? Or why should I even trust you?

[TheIdioticIdiot]

You are only confirmed in the eyes of 3 people: The seer, the gambler, and yourself. I'm quite surprised no one else has challenged you yet. Could it be because you're telling everyone else something? If you have never trusted me, why should I expect you to trust me? Or why should I even trust you?

I have no reason to trust you
everyone else has every reason to trust me (except FGs)
why?
I have seer, 2 gamblers, 2 priests, at least one supreme beings, 1 elf, doctor, and a tradesman in my power
the seer, the doc, and 1 gambler confirmed me as civvy..
FGs targeted me last round, because I am turning it around for the civvies, if I was an FG, which would mean the gambler that gambled me would be an FG, and the seer would be an FG as well
in whichever case, WHY would WE rat out our own? (terro and dragoon)

[Pineapple]

Why should we trust your voting patterns.

Plus, Terro and 1140 were obviously inactive. Maybe they wanted the civilians to gain your trust by attacking you when they knew the doctor was targeting you. Maybe You, "the seer", "the gambler", and those two were all FGs. Maybe "the seer" and "the gambler" don't even exist!

[TheIdioticIdiot]

your word against mine, mate...
I think we know how this goes...

[gavsword]

Why should we trust your voting patterns.

Plus, Terro and 1140 were obviously inactive. Maybe they wanted the civilians to gain your trust by attacking you when they knew the doctor was targeting you. Maybe You, "the seer", "the gambler", and those two were all FGs. Maybe "the seer" and "the gambler" don't even exist!

The Seer is always a role in the game... the gambler was on the player list..... Bye Patchx 

[Pineapple]

Don't exist: never confirmed him.
And he needs to stop dodging the question.

Why should we vote for who you tell us to vote for?

[ShiningSword]

He is confirmed. And thats all(i have my own extra reasons to trust him).
Your story is suspicious. You used your ability in a senceless way.
He helped to lynch 2 FG's. Would he do that if he was a civy?
The first lynching was easy(i told you, there was no need to gambler him, but you wanted to be sure), the last one just followed it. Now the thing gets hard.
If you are really a liar, you are useless, so i think that unless other suspect comes up, you will die.

Why should we trust your voting patterns.

Plus, Terro and 1140 were obviously inactive. Maybe they wanted the civilians to gain your trust by attacking you when they knew the doctor was targeting you. Maybe You, "the seer", "the gambler", and those two were all FGs. Maybe "the seer" and "the gambler" don't even exist!

Bull***t. Demagog can testify that seer and gambler are alive(as anybody who is reading can).
The guys who have been seered and gambled would tell us if there was any dirty stuff going on.
Terro had an invincible defence(a very stupid and senseless yet invincible defence because of the effort of his partners in round 1) which wouldnt have broken without TII. Now we will track down his defenders and sweep through them, which will net us several FG's.

Don't exist: never confirmed him.
And he needs to stop dodging the question.

Why should we vote for who you tell us to vote for?

Because you dont have a better idea?

[gavsword]

Don't exist: never confirmed him.
And he needs to stop dodging the question.

Why should we vote for who you tell us to vote for?

Because we just killed 2 FGs, and he's a confirmed civvy. You're really just burying yourself deeper mate. Seriously more people have confirmed him then there currently are FGs. YOU ARE GOING TO DIE NOW

And hell, your voting patterns are incredibly inconsistent if you are a liar. And if your not a liar, then you're dead.

[RavingRabbid]

So, first round I was lynching a FG? W00tness is in me.

[TheIdioticIdiot]

add this to those:

because I have 2 gamblers and a seer on my side?
that means I can find out on average at least one person's role each round
for now, I am waiting for their results, but you are very suspicious...

[Pineapple]

With two gamblers, you should hurry up and gamble me!

Really, am I going to be the martyr for all the people left in the dark?

Is it my fault that TII doesn't trust me?