Elements Mafia - 16 - Hosted by Dragoon1140

[ShiningSword]

The problem, bat, is the way you defend yourself.
With the interpretation of the rule as drunk did it, your main defence goes out the window.
That does not mean you are quilty, but it means that you are not 100% innocent(although most likely you are).
You asked and got tons of info(like half of all roles). That means you are dangerous if you are not 100% innocent.
I say it so you are less aggresive when you defend yourself, because taking this advise could save your life(and all of our lifes).

[RavingRabbid]

And if she was the doc?

[Korugar]

@BatCountry, you're not done defending yourself. When I(and, I presume, others) demanded an explanation, we weren't looking for rationalization on how you couldn't be an FG. I want to know, it clear details, why you said what you said so as to make us thing KDZ was an FG, and then were wrong. If you don't give us this, you will be lynched, I can almost guarantee that.

[ShiningSword]

korugar is right, thats exactly what we all want.
And by far the best way to save yourself(you can kill me while you are at it).

[$$$man]

BatCountry - 7 (DrunkDestroyer, nilsieboy, Flying Farenheit,  vinvick3714, ddevans96,RootRanger, $$$man)
Korugar - 1 (majofa)
majofa - 1 (Terroking)
ddevans96 - 1 (Shantu)
ShiningSword - 3 (RavingRabbid, BatCountry, Wardead)
Shantu - 1 (Demagog)
Ravingrabbid - 1 (1world24)

I have my reasons.

[BC]

BatCountry - 7 (DrunkDestroyer, nilsieboy, Flying Farenheit,  vinvick3714, ddevans96,RootRanger, $$$man)
Korugar - 1 (majofa)
majofa - 1 (Terroking)
ddevans96 - 2 (Shantu, BatCountry)
ShiningSword - 2 (RavingRabbid, Wardead)
Shantu - 1 (Demagog)
Ravingrabbid - 1 (1world24)

[Dragoon1140]

This was clearly posted for a reason, since I haven't seen it anywhere else. While it doesn't have that much to do with the game itself, it was clearly posted because of you calling out Legit.

I posted the rule clarification because I was asked by (at least) two different people what the rule meant.  I did not direct it towards any one person.

[ZephyrPhantom]

This is just a feeling - but I really don't Batcountry is an FG.  Sure, she may have messed up, but it would've been very strange if she found 2 FGs in a row, unless she knew the gambler and they got it right two times in a row.
I am not very good at singling out the mafia from the innocent, but my guts tells me that Batcountry being an FG is highly unlikely.  I'm going all out with my trust in you guys here.  If you're willing to kill me, so be it, but we shouldn't lose someone who most likely is innocent.
I'd some answers from her though if I am to continue trusting her, and I believe they should be avaliable to the general public.

[Demagog]

When I run this again, I'll add a rule that they can oust each other if they and I (the host) all agree to it. That way they can have access to more strategies, while the host can keep them from ruining the game if they plan to do that.

[Dragoon1140]

Not a bad idea Demagog, not bad at all.  Too bad I already beat you to the punch.  I thought it was clarified in the rules I posted, but I never said that FG's cannot call each other FG's in public for the sake of strategy.  They don't have to PM me about it, of course, but it's obvious when they're trying to pull the strategy.

Perhaps I should have clarified that more when I posted my view of the ousting rule.

[ShiningSword]

I'd some answers from her though if I am to continue trusting her, and I believe they should be avaliable to the general public.

I said that already, you copycat, and so did others.
Good to know about that, dragoon.

[DrunkDestroyer]

This was clearly posted for a reason, since I haven't seen it anywhere else. While it doesn't have that much to do with the game itself, it was clearly posted because of you calling out Legit.

I posted the rule clarification because I was asked by (at least) two different people what the rule meant.  I did not direct it towards any one person.

Which, I would assume, was because of BatCountry's 1st round reveal of a False God and the discussion that followed?