Eldritch - by Kuroaitou

[Aves]

Err fabian I think the assumption was that we're using this round. Didn't you heal yourself last round? Heal is an EoR anyways.

[Demagog]

Fabian if you really think you need healing, I can either heal you or take your place and hide. Let me know ASAP which you would prefer.

[Naii_the_Baf]

Hide yourself, Demagog.

[UTAlan]

Should Lunaris be Watching Dema now?

[Demagog]

I messaged her and told her to watch me, yes.

[Demagog]

Spoiler for Rolls in chat:

[21:23:09] ‹Demagog› ok Eldritch players, I'm going to roll our actions for next round (or the next time we use the hide/watch/unveil strat) so that we have it prepared and we won't get any excuses of people not having enough time
[21:23:45] ‹Demagog› only issue is that we need to make sure no one is watching the same person nor watched by the same person they just watched...
[21:24:09] ‹Demagog› so I'll roll one person at a time and verify as I go
[21:24:10] ‹Lunaris› rip
[21:24:39] ‹Demagog›
(1d11) 11 = 11
[21:25:24] ‹Demagog› so that's 1011 being watched
[21:25:58] ‹Demagog›
(1d10) 9 = 9 ...✓
[21:26:01] ‹AveragePotato› The latest forum post is Re: Bosses, Teams and Propaganda! from Mr Muffin in Forum Brawl. Wow, they're still around?
[21:26:08] ‹kirbylover314›
(5d10) 6 + 7 + 10 + 8 + 7 = 38 ...
[21:26:38] ‹Demagog›
(1d9) 9 = 9
[21:26:49] ‹Demagog› damn I'm good at rolling high numbers
[21:27:35] ‹Demagog›
(1d8) 3 = 3
[21:28:07] ‹Lunaris›
(5d10) 2 + 10 + 6 + 2 + 8 = 28 ...✗
[21:28:22] ‹Demagog› I'm going to reroll that one because Aves just hid
[21:28:37] ‹Demagog›
(1d8) 3 = 3
[21:28:41] ‹Demagog› damn it
[21:28:47] ‹Demagog›
(1d8) 8 = 8
[21:29:22] ‹Demagog› looks like it's your turn to hide UTA
[21:29:44] ‹Demagog›
(1d7) 7 = 7
[21:30:17] ‹Demagog›
(1d6) 5 = 5
[21:31:05] ‹Demagog›
(1d5) 2 = 2
[21:31:36] ‹Demagog›
(1d4) 1 = 1
[21:31:58] ‹Demagog›
(1d3) 1 = 1
[21:32:05] ‹Discord› whoa dema
[21:32:18] ‹Demagog› lol sup?
[21:32:45] ‹Demagog› 1 more roll
[21:32:47] ‹Demagog›
(1d2) 2 = 2
[21:33:03] ‹killsdazombies›

These rolls are for the next time we use this strategy. We may not employ it next round depending on how this one goes (people at low HP or finding a member of the PC team this round).

Group 1:

1011686 (Uses Hide)
theelkspeaks (Watches 1011686)
DoubleCapitals (Unveils theelkspeaks)

Group 2

UTAlan (Uses Hide)
Ryli (Watches UTAlan)
Lunaris (Unveils Ryli)
fabian771 (Unveils Lunaris)

Group 3

Linkcat (Uses Hide)
Aves (Watches Linkcat)
Fippe94 (Unveils Aves)
Demagog (Unveils Fippe94)

[Kuroaitou]

Shadows turn to darkness...

Round 6
The day has ended.

Player	Health
Linkcat	100
fabian771	100
Aves	100
Demagog	85
Lunaris	100
Fippe94	100
Ryli	90
UTAlan	100
theelkspeaks	100
DoubleCapitals	100
1011686	90

Lunaris has been Unveiled: she used 'Watch' on Demagog on Round 5.
1011696 has been Unveiled: he did not use any action on Round 5.

[Demagog]

Ok, someone stunned 1011 so he couldn't watch Aves, it seems. Not sure if 1011 actually used watch, but I think we can give him the benefit of the doubt.

If you guys prefer, now that Lunaris will be able to verify with all of you as to me not being a PC player (at the moment at least), I can reroll our actions and not make them public. By PM'ing everyone their actions, we can ensure that the PC team has a difficult time stopping our strategy.

[Demagog]

Suspicion on Aves can go up a little, but at the moment I think it's unlikely he is on the PC team, since he was the one that initially put us on the path of this plan.

[Aves]

This is why I suggested we use multiple people to watch, makes it so there's less ambiguity. Though I guess next time they could just stun the hider rather than the watcher, which is probably what happened to the other group.

As for vetting Dema, we can do this, but only after we verify Lunaris as well. If the watcher+hider pair reports no incongruity, then they are either both safe or both cultists (probably). If the hider+cultist say different things, then one of them must be a cultist.

[Demagog]

If we go with multiple watchers, we will need to go with one group of 5 and one of 6. The group with 6 would have one extra unveiler. It would look like this for the actions:

Hide
Watch
Unveil watcher 1
Watch
Unveil watcher 2

So that would work. If you guys want, I can swap UTA and Lunaris. If everyone else does as requested, we can know who isn't following the plan. In the previous round it seems that too many people didn't do as requested, so it's hard to draw any conclusions.

[Aves]

That won't work, since they could just stun the hider. We still need redundancies, but each step should be harder to subvert.

Instead, something along the lines of:

Hider
Watch Hider
Watch Hider
Follow Watcher
Follow Watcher
Follow Hider
Follow Hider

If the hider is stunned, then we have the followers to look at who stunned them.
If the watchers are stunned, we have the followers to look at who stunned them.
If the followers are stunned, it doesn't matter because they can't stun watcher+hider+follower.