you realize that this this "suggestion" (not entirely sure its real) is pretty much like trying to ban avatars of celebrities.
1. its not going to happen.... PERIOD, so get the flying f*** over it panzy
2. sg would be pissed if anyone suggested banning celeb avatars... *cough* looks like Angelina Joule *cough*
3. did i mention G E T O V E R I T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4. personal opinion will never merit banishment of anything. it has to be reasonable, which is something you aren't capable of
unit...You know you're being childish, right?
Overview: You compare it to banning pictures of celebrities. This is false analogy; celebrities are not childish nor perverse in any way. However, many believe that manga/anime characters (ash ketchum, naruto, goku) are from childish media, and Uppercut finds that this undermines the "professionalism" of the forums.
To thoroughly attack your points:
1. I think that it can happen because mods can certainly be endowed with the power to change a user's profile picture. And if we just "got over" discrimination and oppression because change was "not gonna happen", then we wouldn't be where we are now.
2. ScaredGirl would not be pissed at anything if a higher power wanted her to change her profile picture to something less obscene. You clearly beg the question with this point. In addition, there is no "higher power" (except maybe zanz), and she would not "be pissed" if she was the one who passed the rule.
3. Sigh.
4. He's plenty reasonable, and your personal insults are really immature. It only shows that you've only read the topic w/o actually reading the opening post. His reasons are a) anime/manga images are aesthetically unpleasing and b) anyone who uses an anime/manga default portrays themself as a wapanese, and since many use anime/manga defaults, a large portion of this otherwise "credible" community is portrayed as wapanese...Therefore, banning anime/manga avatars would make this community more credible.