Post Unconfirmed Bugs Here!

[Silverrey]

1st. When you target a creature with a spell, Reflective Shields will never block the attack, even if it is under the "Reflectable (??) Spells".

I kinda suspected that but there is no description in the wiki describing that. It should be 'Replicated Attack' instead of 'Reflection' - reflection repels, it doesn't allow something through it.

2nd. What the heck is in your SS?

You'll have to excuse my ignorance, what's SS? 

3rd. Spells only reflect once.

Is that once per card played, or does it mean that once a Lightning card has been 'reflected' any Lightning played after is immune?

4th. Not sure, but I think Lightning can't be reflected.

This is quoted from the Not-A-Bug section on Reflecting Shield + Poison
"While it's not clear by the text on the cards, reflecting shields reflect direct damage spells (fire bolt, lightning, siphon life, etc.)...". I think the wiki description needs to be fleshed out some.

Thanks for replying back on this!

[EvaRia]

A shield is a permanent that you, the elemental holds yourself.
As such, it will only protect yourself from harm, you cannot use it to protect your allies.
Reflective shields will only protect you from any damage directed at YOU, not your creatures.

[Archaeo]

This might not be a bug so much as I just might need to buy a new mouse, but I'll post anyway just in case.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,15016.0.html (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,15016.0.html)

[Ryli]

3rd. Spells only reflect once.

Is that once per card played, or does it mean that once a Lightning card has been 'reflected' any Lightning played after is immune?

It means that if both players have reflective shields up it only bounces off the target player, otherwise you'd be left with a bit of an awkward situation.

[deepdown]

@EvaRia: I'm not sure if it has been mentioned before: druidic/jade staff heals via passive regen ability under stasis (not sure about freeze) effect. (Can be easily reproduced.)
Again, it is so minor that I really don't want to start a new topic about it.

Think its just like that the devourer still sucked quanta under BB, but is has been corrected couple of months ago...

[Wesley Gibson]

Using antimatter on a poisonous creature allows it to bypass a shield and applies healing, but also poisons the recipient of said healing.  Not sure what to think here, might not even be a bug.

Personally I think it would be cool if it added purification counters instead.

[Ryli]

Using antimatter on a poisonous creature allows it to bypass a shield and applies healing, but also poisons the recipient of said healing.  Not sure what to think here, might not even be a bug.

This is intended. It doesn't matter if the stinger (or whatever the creature attacks with) doesn't hurt you it's still poisonous

[Wesley Gibson]

I just assumed that because I've apparently converted their harmful matter into healing antimatter, their poison would become an antidote.  Seems to follow in a world of ridiculous magical logic...

[EvaRia]

It isn't healing you.
It's doing negative damage.
As such, the damage will still poison you, whether you like it or not.

[Wesley Gibson]

I would put forth that the fact that it is "negative damage" not healing actually supports my point of view.

If I were going to guess at conceptually what the antimatter spell is supposed to be doing, I'd picture it as transmuting the creature's matter into the opposite of matter.  Antimatter.  I picture it as completely warping said creature into its antimatter equivalent.

For whatever reason, the interpretation of the spell is that is that contact with antimatter that would inflict damage normally inflicts negative damage instead.  Anti-claws cause anti-damage.  Anti-bites cause anti-damage.

In this admittedly goofy conceptual framework, it seems out of place to me that the antimatter equivalent of poison is just poison, not anti-poison.

[WisperingWind]

I changed my deck for the fg that the oracle predicted, and it was a different one. I was killed . Can the oracle be wrong?

[Ryli]

I changed my deck for the fg that the oracle predicted, and it was a different one. I was killed . Can the oracle be wrong?

Did you log out first? The god changes if you do that.