(http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/63/primd.png) | (http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6911/primu.png) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
were it not for water nymph, this card would be fine. but water nymph says "hi pillar, bye pillar, hi new nymph" multiple times per turn. its like steroids for nymphomania, of that fg that uses nymphs tears.Ya mean Jezebel? Well, she'd have to start swapping her Quantum Pillars for Entropy Pillars, but otherwise, it's pretty solid.
were it not for water nymph, this card would be fine. but water nymph says "hi pillar, bye pillar, hi new nymph" multiple times per turn. its like steroids for nymphomania, of that fg that uses nymphs tears.i didnt realize water nymphs could use their ability more than once per turn?
The cost should be higher. Even if pillars cost nothing, there is limited deck space and draw rate. 1 :entropy for an endless supply of pillars each turn of the same element as an existing cluster just doesn't seem right...that's a bit of an oversimplification. its not just 1 :entropy, its 1 :entropy + 1 :entropy x number of pillars generated. you have to think to yourself "how much would i *pay* to put a pillar in play?" i personally would not pay 1 :entropy + 2 :entropy per pillar
Agreed, keep current idea. I'd suggest making it free to deploy but make it 2 :entropy to generate. For a card that can generate a pillar every turn, it's a fair price to pay for saving some card space.
just 1 :entropy for pillar mitosis? Definitely needs a cost increase.If you put mitosis on a RoL, it's free to activate. I think the cast cost of this card may need to be 2 :entropy but I would not change the activation cost and I like the ability as it is. I would like to see OldTrees' thoughts on balancing this card, if it doesn't conflict with this being an entry in the QG competition.
The upped version is too powerful. Starting from turn 3 it goes even, turn 4 on it gains esponentially. The unupped might be intresting.But then you will either need an Entropy Mark or a bunch of Amethyst Pillars to utilize this card to its fullest extent. Generating Pillars for other elements other than Entropy is fine, as you will need to draw this AND a pillar of the element your deck is based off of, but if one is running a mono Entropy then this card is OP.
The problem with that card is that, if you play them off of mark, it generates a lot of quanta over time. It's n*(n+1)/2 quanta, where n is the number of turns. It's a LOT of quanta. Think bolt stall... It might be even worth of a whole FG deck if it comes out! It's strong and fast. I like the idea, but it needs to cost a lot more.The upped version is too powerful. Starting from turn 3 it goes even, turn 4 on it gains esponentially. The unupped might be intresting.But then you will either need an Entropy Mark or a bunch of Amethyst Pillars to utilize this card to its fullest extent. Generating Pillars for other elements other than Entropy is fine, as you will need to draw this AND a pillar of the element your deck is based off of, but if one is running a mono Entropy then this card is OP.
I would like to see OldTrees' thoughts on balancing this card, if it doesn't conflict with this being an entry in the QG competition.I do not have time to balance all of the submissions therefore I do not have time to balance any.
they cant, but if you have a bunch out already, youll be getting malignant nymphswere it not for water nymph, this card would be fine. but water nymph says "hi pillar, bye pillar, hi new nymph" multiple times per turn. its like steroids for nymphomania, of that fg that uses nymphs tears.i didnt realize water nymphs could use their ability more than once per turn?
hmm this was a long ride, i may start over and try something similar.That would be wise. There was definitely something in here of great quality. I am unsure why it ended up archived.