Post by: Ajit on August 22, 2012, 09:23:21 am
(http://i.imgur.com/nA5U9.png) | (http://i.imgur.com/qEw5Z.png) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Post by: nensuru on August 22, 2012, 09:50:22 am
Good synergy with crusader, solar buckler, seraph, firefly, pegasus, sky blitz.... so much possibilities
I'm giving full support to this card
Post by: tintinwong on August 22, 2012, 10:58:56 am
wording in a card is important.
Actually affecting your opponent isint that bad. It's like a 1 turn super denial unless your opponent is mono light or something.
Looks like a fun card.
Post by: Chapuz on August 22, 2012, 11:20:59 am
I love the idea, it would make solar shield more used. This mechanic, although, can be implemented to any element just with a different name.
Post by: Atom_heart on August 22, 2012, 12:06:54 pm
Good Job!
Post by: blahs15 on August 22, 2012, 02:21:38 pm
As in, you'll see more mono-lights that have just a few other cards. And i think this would only work really well in light cus of things like bioluminescence
Post by: Luminous on August 22, 2012, 02:24:00 pm
But it must be counterable from many things. I'd like to see a permanent. Like Sundial.
Post by: Ajit on August 22, 2012, 08:47:01 pm
Post by: coldfire1627 on August 22, 2012, 09:02:58 pm
Or, change the effect so that only the next one or two cards played or skills activated cost :light instead of their normal quanta.
Just my two cents. :)
Post by: OdinVanguard on August 22, 2012, 10:11:29 pm
As a 1 turn effect this is good as it is.
Post by: Ajit on August 22, 2012, 10:53:00 pm
Post by: AnonymousRevival on August 22, 2012, 11:01:52 pm
Post by: Ajit on August 22, 2012, 11:09:23 pm
(http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd13/Aj1t1/saintspng.png)
Post by: Atom_heart on August 23, 2012, 01:36:02 am
Seems to me like the ephemeral version of this (however, this effects only creature abilities): http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,35338.msg445262.html#msg445262 (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,35338.msg445262.html#msg445262)
Yeap! This is the card I was talking about!
Anonymous is not lazy at all and found it for me! :P
Nevermind, I like halo better! lol
Post by: Ajit on August 23, 2012, 06:11:24 am
Post by: blahs15 on August 23, 2012, 06:45:28 am
Creatures, permanents, spells, and abilities cost Light quanta for one turn. Discard Halo."
So does this mean that you can save the permanent in your hand for an indefinite period of time before using it?
Are you sure this is the best idea? instead of being able to use it only the turn directly after played?
I'm not saying it should be one way or the other... I have no idea. But I thought I should just bring the question up for thought.
Post by: Ajit on August 23, 2012, 10:20:19 am
It is definitely a consideration whether you would HAVE to use it your next turn or not, but as of right now I see no problem with the way it is now.
Post by: tintinwong on August 23, 2012, 12:44:32 pm
I think that a better wording would be
Aura: Sacrifice this card to have all your quanta cost to cost Light quanta instead for 1 turn.
Or this if you like epic wording
Aura: Sacrifice this card. All cost costs light quanta for 1 turn.
I suppose its grammatically correct.
Post by: blahs15 on August 23, 2012, 02:01:35 pm
In most or if not all card games, discard means that a card is destroyed/removed from your hand.
I think that a better wording would be
Aura: Sacrifice this card to have all your quanta cost to cost Light quanta instead for 1 turn.
Or this if you like epic wording
Aura: Sacrifice this card. All cost costs light quanta for 1 turn.
I suppose its grammatically correct.
All costs cost :light quanta for 1 turn.*?
I'm not sure if they both work, but it would still be hard to understand with the costs costing you to cast the costs. ...wut. :P
Post by: coldfire1627 on August 23, 2012, 04:11:48 pm
Or how about "All quanta costs become :light for 1 turn."In most or if not all card games, discard means that a card is destroyed/removed from your hand.
I think that a better wording would be
Aura: Sacrifice this card to have all your quanta cost to cost Light quanta instead for 1 turn.
Or this if you like epic wording
Aura: Sacrifice this card. All cost costs light quanta for 1 turn.
I suppose its grammatically correct.
All costs cost :light quanta for 1 turn.*?
I'm not sure if they both work, but it would still be hard to understand with the costs costing you to cast the costs. ...wut. :P
Post by: Joseph7 on August 24, 2012, 12:29:05 am
Post by: Ajit on August 26, 2012, 04:00:54 am
Post by: odideph on August 31, 2012, 12:58:30 pm
TBH at first i was like "so when i use this, i must discard any Halo i may be having in my hand too?!".
Post by: ZephyrPhantom on August 31, 2012, 01:08:24 pm
If Sundial is anything to go by I don't think you need to add that 'Discard Halo' part. (Permanents with a timed effect seemed to be assumed to self-destruct once that effect ends.)
Post by: Annele on August 31, 2012, 11:23:35 pm
This card will not be permitted into the Crucible due to one or more of the following errors:
- Table filled out incorrectly.
Correct these errors as soon as possible and feel free to submit again when ready.
Thank you. ^_^
If the card costs elemental quanta (not random), then this must be expressed with the correct quanta symbol. (eg. 7 :entropy)
Post by: coldfire1627 on September 01, 2012, 01:39:41 pm
I really like this card! Fix it up so we can vote on it!
Post by: Ajit on September 01, 2012, 04:22:53 pm
Post by: Annele on September 11, 2012, 08:29:26 am
This card will not be permitted into the Crucible due to one or more of the following errors:
- Table filled out incorrectly.
Correct these errors as soon as possible and feel free to submit again when ready.
Thank you. ^_^
If the card costs elemental quanta (not :rainbow), then this must be expressed with the correct quanta symbol. (eg. 7 :entropy) UNLESS it costs 0, in which just a zero will suffice.