Flat Worm | Planaria

[flyingsnails]

I love this idea!!! 

 Because of the two sides to this card it won't be situational. And, anyway, even if the infecting is situational, it's trying to counter a situation that players come across far too often; immortal Oty's that have no chance of being killed or rendered usless.

[Optimalist]

Modified as per players' & Card Curator's comments.

Didn't really change it how I suggested but anyhow.

From my understanding, your suggestion was to trigger the Deja Vu. The trigger is open to the interpretation of the coder, I personally have no preference. Whether the Deja Vu happens on upon any kind of damage or when the worm supposedly dies, works either way. The main point is to create smaller worms from a bigger worm.

Maybe I'm missing something, could you point out what the change should be? I'm pretty much open to change if it makes the coding easier.

[Optimalist]

I love this idea!!! 

 Because of the two sides to this card it won't be situational. And, anyway, even if the infecting is situational, it's trying to counter a situation that players come across far too often; immortal Oty's that have no chance of being killed or rendered usless.

Thanks for the love. Currently, only shields (spine, fire, permafrost) can pwn Quinted Otys. A creature-to-creature pwnage would level the field a little more.

[kidtroubadour]

Best new card idea - but quick questions -

Does split creature retain a poison status?  If I'm reading it correctly, a virus would split the card on the first turn to take damage - that would split at 1/3, and if deja vu were invoked, there would be 2 1/3 worms... or does it split into 2 1/2 worms after virus?  Do each of the subsequent worms maintain their poisoned status?

[obsidian]

nice idea

hopefully will end up in the game

[dekskose]

fractal flat worm deck

[Kuroaitou]

According to recent changes, it looks like parts of your idea were used Optimalist:

- A few creatures gained the "poisonous" passive skill: Toadfish, Chrysaora and Arsenic. Eating a "poisonous" creature will cause - believe it or not - poisoning.

From: http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6902.0.html

Looks like Otyughs now have at least 3 creatures to worry about consuming or else be screwed over. >.>

[finkel]

A few questions:
wouldn't any creature die when damaged if it was at 1 hp? Damage means taking damage, and if you only have 1hp, then any damage will kill you.

second, wouldn't this be impossible to kill? Every time you deal damage, it just splits. So a fire shield would just make this essentially a malignant cell.

[Scaredgirl]

According to recent changes, it looks like parts of your idea were used Optimalist:

- A few creatures gained the "poisonous" passive skill: Toadfish, Chrysaora and Arsenic. Eating a "poisonous" creature will cause - believe it or not - poisoning.

From: http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6902.0.html

Looks like Otyughs now have at least 3 creatures to worry about consuming or else be screwed over. >.>

Actually I doubt Zanz got the idea from this card. Otyugh getting poisoned when eating something poisonous is something that's been suggested many times in the past. Then again.. who knows?

But one thing is clear, it's not nearly enough for this card to get into Reliquary.

[Optimalist]

But one thing is clear, it's not nearly enough for this card to get into Reliquary.

Sad. But it was fun thinking about it.

[bsurma]

Planaria + Plate/Heavy Armor/Blessing/Rage Potion... oh yeah

This is the ultimate buffing target. And finally Otyughs could have some counters

AND it could make a  / deck even more dangerous in PvP.

[silverblack]

actually this card is very good, but i find it a lot like the puffer fish. Like the plniria the puffer fish also infects the creature that eats it, the only difference is that this card can split into two. I still say it's a very good card, but it's a lot like the puffer fish, except the puffer fish is (to me) better.