Scorching Scorpion | Scorching Scorpion

[GG]

NAME: Scorching Scorpion ELEMENT: Fire COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 1|1 TEXT: Scorch: Reduce maximum HP by 1 upon every successful attack. Cause poisoning if ingested.	NAME: Scorching Scorpion ELEMENT: Fire COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 1|3 TEXT: Scorch: Reduce maximum HP by 1 upon every successful attack. Cause poisoning if ingested.

ART: Zanzarino (Forest Scorpion | Scorpion image hue modified) IDEA: girlsgeneration NOTES: An addition to the three currently existing scorpions. Got the idea from my own shard submission (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,28846.msg399918#msg399918). SERIES:

[maverixk]

Just a question: Why does this scorpion have attack already? I know forest scorpion already does, but this is stronger than that...

[Xenocidius]

Similar (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,26010)? Hmm ... It could be a Salamander instead?

[GG]

Similar (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,26010)? Hmm ... It could be a Salamander instead?

I forgot to mention that I realize there's already a scorpion expansion pack by Malebolgia. I did not realize that the name was similar though, but there are plenty of card ideas with similar/same names (ex: apocalypse, zombie, etc), and the two cards have distinctly different abilities.

Just a question: Why does this scorpion have attack already? I know forest scorpion already does, but this is stronger than that...

This scorpion doesn't stack poison, and against a non-healing deck, it's actually weaker than the counterpart.

[Hyroen]

I forgot to mention that I realize there's already a scorpion expansion pack by Malebolgia. I did not realize that the name was similar though, but there are plenty of card ideas with similar/same names (ex: apocalypse, zombie, etc), and the two cards have distinctly different abilities.

As for the names issue, I see it as a formality and technicality but a kind gesture. If both cards are in the Crucible it might create confusion. Try to distinguish both names.
I think I've asked before but I wonder what the official protocol is on same-name card ideas?

[EmeraldTiger]

how about Singe, Sear, Char, or  Parch

[GG]

how about Singe, Sear, Char, or  Parch

I've asked malebolgia for permission to use this card name, assuming that he's done working with his card.

(seems like he's gone though... <_<)

[Captain Scibra]

Well, I am actually popping in now and then, giving myself some space with the game, but yeah you can use the name.  I like the idea better than mine, mine is a little cheesy to be honest, something I had with some of the scorpions.

[Toxx]

Love. I get so annoyed when people spam so many healing cards

Edit: I don't know a thing about making card's but this seems a little weak to be a fire card maybe 2 | 2 for the unupped and 3 | 2 for the upped version.

It would be great to see this card and perhaps others cards that does a variation of this ability added to the game.

[Conchobear]

I like the idea but it might be a bit too powerful currently. Perhaps starting with no attack would be better but then again it doesn't seem as powerful as Dune Scorpion. Still a very interesting idea.

[maverixk]

I like the idea but it might be a bit too powerful currently. Perhaps starting with no attack would be better but then again it doesn't seem as powerful as Dune Scorpion. Still a very interesting idea.

Well dune scorpion is by far the strongest scorpion once it has attack, so it's not really a fair comparison. Forest scorpion is the weakest, so it starts of with attack.