Dwarven Warrior | Dwarven Berserker

[PhantomFox]

NAME: Dwarven Warrior ELEMENT: Earth COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2|5 CARD TEXT: Battle Rage: Dwarven Warrior gains +1|0 each turn you deal more damage to your opponent than they did to you.	NAME: Dwarven Berserker ELEMENT: Earth COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3|6 CARD TEXT: Battle Rage: Dwarven Berserker gains +1|0 each turn you deal more damage to your opponent than they did to you.

ART: ZiroFalcao http://browse.deviantart.com/?q=dwarf%20warrior&order=9&offset=24&offset=24#/d21kjrq IDEA: PhantomFox NOTES: The check applies to the damage you did this turn compared to the opponent's most recent turn. SERIES:

[ZGiSH]

I do like the snowballing nature of this card. It seems a bit weak at first but then you realize that if you did more damage to begin with, the card itself will guarantee that you do more damage in the future ( securing even more ATK points ). The HP for the non-up and the upgraded versions are perfect to prevent otyguh and the sort.

Big +1 from me.

I don't see any huge flaws.

[RedWarrior0]

Hehe. Nice combo with fractal. I agree with the statement that it's not too overpowered. Looks like a fun card.

[ratcharmer]

Neat mechanic. Might actually be a bit UP.

a 2/3 creature for 4 is pretty weak, and the growth ability isn't all that strong, since it will never work as quickly as blaze or growth. (max +1/+0 per turn). Compare it to Forest spirit and  Fire Spirit and I think this card comes out behind.

I'd say cut the cost a little, maybe to 3 or even 2 ?

[jmizzle7]

I would use this in tandem with Basilisk Blood and Otyugh or something. This little guy would grow to be a huge beast in no time.

[guolin]

Neat mechanic. Might actually be a bit UP.

a 2/3 creature for 4 is pretty weak, and the growth ability isn't all that strong, since it will never work as quickly as blaze or growth. (max +1/+0 per turn). Compare it to Forest spirit and  Fire Spirit and I think this card comes out behind.

I'd say cut the cost a little, maybe to 3 or even 2 ?

Growth creatures require quanta to grow. This guy does not.

[murtle]

nice card
like the art
can be good with rush decks

[PhantomFox]

Neat mechanic. Might actually be a bit UP.

a 2/3 creature for 4 is pretty weak, and the growth ability isn't all that strong, since it will never work as quickly as blaze or growth. (max +1/+0 per turn). Compare it to Forest spirit and  Fire Spirit and I think this card comes out behind.

I'd say cut the cost a little, maybe to 3 or even 2 ?

Growth creatures require quanta to grow. This guy does not.

While the growth is conditional, it's also free.  Let's run the calculations.  I did some research, which you can see in the Design Theory section.  2 attack is worth 2 quanta.  An attack growth ability is also worth 2.  However, this is only +1/+0, but it's also free, so that should even out.  2+2=4.

[guolin]

Neat mechanic. Might actually be a bit UP.

a 2/3 creature for 4 is pretty weak, and the growth ability isn't all that strong, since it will never work as quickly as blaze or growth. (max +1/+0 per turn). Compare it to Forest spirit and  Fire Spirit and I think this card comes out behind.

I'd say cut the cost a little, maybe to 3 or even 2 ?

Growth creatures require quanta to grow. This guy does not.

While the growth is conditional, it's also free.  Let's run the calculations.  I did some research, which you can see in the Design Theory section.  2 attack is worth 2 quanta.  An attack growth ability is also worth 2.  However, this is only +1/+0, but it's also free, so that should even out.  2+2=4.

Was that to ratcharmer? Because your post simply backed up my post.

[PhantomFox]

Yeah, quoted the wrong post.

[Kuroaitou]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Change the art immediately. All artwork from Blizzard Entertainment is under strict copyright and cannot be used for any commercial or non-commercial work, published or otherwise.
-Change "Ability" to "Card Text" in your table upon the new changes reflected in this post (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5039.msg156494#msg156494).

[PhantomFox]

Art modified.