Dimensional Prison | Cosmic Prison

[Drake_XIV]

Wondering if the attack prevention warrants it being cheaper than Quint...

[choongmyoung]

Wondering if the attack prevention warrants it being cheaper than Quint...

I'm sure it isn't in normal situation, but anyway people will play this in proper situations. (like Singularity Antimera)

[Drake_XIV]

Wondering if the attack prevention warrants it being cheaper than Quint...

I'm sure it isn't in normal situation, but anyway people will play this in proper situations. (like Singularity Antimera)

But then isn't that situational?

[choongmyoung]

Wondering if the attack prevention warrants it being cheaper than Quint...

I'm sure it isn't in normal situation, but anyway people will play this in proper situations. (like Singularity Antimera)

But then isn't that situational?

There's many situations to play this.
SoP or Dials / Early-Speedy protection in rainbow or against some Shields (situational) / Deckout win including Pestal / Singular Antimera etc

[Hyroen]

Interesting card and nicely modified art to boot.

[Drake_XIV]

Wondering if the attack prevention warrants it being cheaper than Quint...

I'm sure it isn't in normal situation, but anyway people will play this in proper situations. (like Singularity Antimera)

But then isn't that situational?

There's many situations to play this.
SoP or Dials / Early-Speedy protection in rainbow or against some Shields (situational) / Deckout win including Pestal / Singular Antimera etc

But that's the thing.  For mass quint, isn't this too cheap?

[choongmyoung]

Wondering if the attack prevention warrants it being cheaper than Quint...

I'm sure it isn't in normal situation, but anyway people will play this in proper situations. (like Singularity Antimera)

But then isn't that situational?

There's many situations to play this.
SoP or Dials / Early-Speedy protection in rainbow or against some Shields (situational) / Deckout win including Pestal / Singular Antimera etc

But that's the thing.  For mass quint, isn't this too cheap?

Well, it can be in specific situations.
Instead of the cost increase, I think adding a weakness like Cloak is better because a mass quint which only can be destroyed with PC is quite strong.
Like.. making it a creature(oh it's quite close to lightning rod, nevermind) or adding a timer for 3~5 turns, or something like that.

[waterzx]

Wow! You guys really think of a lot ways to use this card ! Now that I see the potential with fractal pests or something like that.

I agree with the cost increase, probably a higher cost than cloak.

But I'm hesitant about a time limit because that's one of the biggest feature of this card. I've been thinking about a keep up cost, like one quantum per turn. What do you think ?

[Aves]

A quantum upkeep sounds logical, but it's untested in the actual game except for flooding, which is hardly ever used; thus the effects on balance haven't been really explored.
If 1 quantum isn't enough, an alternate idea is one quantum upkeep per creature; thus there's no upkeep if you're not using the quint, but if you're going devtal you'd better be prepared. Admittedly, that looks and sounds a bit clunky, but I'm just throwing it out there. We don't want to deviate too far form the norm, I think.

[Vesst]

Awesome but not for rush.

I think CC will be overpowered with this card -
You just eat rush creatures with untargetable fallen druids and maxwell demons,
then remove and attack FTW.

[Drake_XIV]

Well, it wasn't made for rush.  More for stallbreaker.

I like how you say eat but forget about the all important Oty.

That last line is essentially a similar response to how SoPa works.

[waterzx]

Ok here're two proposals:

1. Normal version costs 2 but absorbs 2 per turn
    Upgraded version costs 4  but absorbs only 1 per turn

2. Both versions do not absorb quanta per turn. Instead they take up the valuable shield slot and are balanced on playing costs only.

Any ideas on these?