Cloud | Cumulonimbus

[TimerClock14]

NAME: Cloud ELEMENT: Air COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|5 TEXT: Generates 1  and 1  per turn. Generates a thunderstorm if hit with lightning.	NAME: Cumulonimbus ELEMENT: Air COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|7 TEXT: Generates 1  and 1  quantum per turn. Generates a thunderstorm if hit with lightning.

ART: TimerClock14 IDEA: TimerClock14 NOTES: This is probably the crudest drawing of a cloud ever. Passive ability: airborne & cloud (see text ^ ) NOTE: WHEN EITHER CARD IS HIT WITH LIGHTNING/THUNDERBOLT; THE RESULTING AFFECT IS THE EQUVALENT OF PLAYING THE THUNDERSTORM/LIGHTNING STORM SPELL. YOU ARE NOT TRANSFERRING THE LIGHTNING/THUNDERBOLT SPELL TO ALL YOUR OPPONENT'S CARDS....THANK YOU. Airborne. SERIES:

All criticism is happily accepted here! Thanks in advance to all who post!

EDIT: Used new card creator to place  & in the card description.
EDIT: Used a very noticeable method to clarify secondary ability. 

Please go here (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,13822.0.html) if you want to check out the series!

[SickPillow]

4 is kinda expensive for a 0 attack creature, even if it does give you quanta.
i'm not sure what kind of deck i would build with this card.
you have some sort of combos in mind?

[TimerClock14]

4 is kinda expensive for a 0 attack creature, even if it does give you quanta.
i'm not sure what kind of deck i would build with this card.
you have some sort of combos in mind?

I should probably lower it. As for strategy: just your basic fractal strategy. Could be useful in the FQ strategy. (I guess) Tell me if you find other uses please!

[AnonymousRevival]

I think it is best if the creature costs 2 or at most 3 quanta, that would be better.

[OldTrees]

This may be too powerful or it may be just right.
This is 1 card that generates 2 quanta per turn with an investment cost of 4.

Turn	1	2	3	4	5	6	7
Quanta	-2	0	2	4	6	8	10

This card is more prone to removal but is essentially a double pendulum with a cost of 4.

I am personally of the opinion that this is not overpowered and that it would help if appropriate variants are created for the rest of the sub group [ , , ] or maybe also [ , , , , , , , ]

[TimerClock14]

changed cost of both to 2 instead of 4

added poll to see what the cost should be

[OldTrees]

Now it is too powerful
It is two pendulum for 1 card and 1 quanta (calculation done at end of turn)

This cost needs to be increased back to 4.
If you play a fractal cloud, Blue Crawler, Firefly deck the Fractal cloud will pay for itself and be able to help pay for the damage fractal even if it cost 4

[TimerClock14]

when you put it that way, it IS way too OP. I'm gonna wait for more votes before changing it again though. (really tedious process to change it)

[AnonymousRevival]

I suggest to leave this for a few days for more people to decide. In the meantime, keep updating so more people will see it.

[TimerClock14]

sounds good (also up my post count)

[TimerClock14]

I am personally of the opinion that this is not overpowered and that it would help if appropriate variants are created for the rest of the sub group [ , , ] or maybe also [ , , , , , , , ]

What exactly do you mean by this?

[dramore]

This may be too powerful or it may be just right.
This is 1 card that generates 2 quanta per turn with an investment cost of 4.

Turn	1	2	3	4	5	6	7
Quanta	-2	0	2	4	6	8	10

This card is more prone to removal but is essentially a double pendulum with a cost of 4.

I am personally of the opinion that this is not overpowered and that it would help if appropriate variants are created for the rest of the sub group [ , , ] or maybe also [ , , , , , , , ]

You know your right. This card could be the start of a whole new para-element card group. I.E. Dust ( , )
Magma (  ,  ) Mud (  ,  ) Steam ( ,  ) Smoke ( ,  ) Cloud (  ,  ).Just a thought. Other elements could do it too. Like Shadow ( . )so on and so fourth.