on the other hand, they may not have enough permanent control(and i dont want to give them deflags for the rounds later
After testing and thinking a bit there's some truth to the above. I don't think Zeru has a possible counter to fractal phoenix. It's too fast and he can't avoid shieldlock. Giving him deflags when we know he has a Fire deck could be a misstep. But if Ant were to use fractal phoenix first and actually lose, Zeru's salvage is less meaningful.
Not sure why you'd take out the immos, especially if EQs is a possibility. Gotta have a couple deflags for diss shields/discords. This would be my suggestion:
5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f6 5f6 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61t 61t 61t 61t 622 622 622 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 808
I don't think the grabby deck is a bad idea. I tested it with plastiqe last round and the outcome was embarrassing for entropy. It's struggled in testing a little bit more this round. Maybe it's just coincidence. If you DO go with the grabby deck, I would not add a fifth grabby as I was often short on both
and
. I'd consider adding a fire spirit in place of the lycan. Didn't look to me like a fourth deflag was needed; I didn't mention it but in testing I sometimes didn't deflag your discord because I needed a shift to
, for instance.
Meh. I like our chances either way and if Antagon loses, we get to try the other idea.