Crimson Dragon Deck

[Robotocracy]

by Robotocracy

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f4 5f4 5f4 5f5 5f6 5f6 5f7 5f8 8po

A pretty minimalist fire deck.  Very offense oriented.  The primary strategy is to get as many crimson dragons out as possible, but another useful way to win is gathering lots of fire quanta and using Fahrenheit + fire bolt for heavy damage.  Rain of fire and deflagrations deal with pesky creatures and permanents.  All non-upgraded cards, so it's cheap.  Beats lvl 3s without fail, and overpowers most non-rainbow non-upgraded pvp decks.  Feedback?

[icecoldbro]

it sounds ok to be a non uped i use a fire/aether so everybody has his preferences

[Robotocracy]

Update: I've playing top 50s with this deck, and it wins most of the time.

[hermantheowl]

HOw can a fit a 2nd farenheight in it?

[icybraker]

I'd take out a Rain of Fire for it. You can still beat Fractal decks with your Lances, and it's an expensive card. Alternatively, you could replace the RoF and a Pillar for a Fahrenheit and a Fire Shield.

[hermantheowl]

I use A firebolt instead of Rain of fire, one less pillar and a seconmd farneheight. WIth out the second weapon I leave it the way it is. Maybe replace Rain of fire with firebolt but I faced an aether deck an RAin of fire would have killed immortals. Still out raced it. I think using deflag on its shields would be more important. If you take out rain of fire for a firebolt, take out a pliiar for another deflag?

[Decktrya]

Rof does not effect immaterial creatures... if you wnat to kill imaterial creatures oyu need fire shield....

[hermantheowl]

whoops

[Robotocracy]

I replaced a pillar with a fire shield, which gets at those pesky immortal creatures and does wonders against decks using RoL + Hope.  I haven't yet tried 2 fahrenheits, I'll test it out.  Though, one of the points of this deck is that it is cheap and low on rares, so accessible to newer players.  However, if you want to get more expensive you can up some cards and make it work better (and RoF becomes cheaper quanta-wise).

[hermantheowl]

I found this
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5828.0.html


2 farenheits is just an option, you only need 1 to start

Check out plastique's reply on the linked post. I have been using the phoneix version. I am deathly afreaid of LAva GOlem decks so I want the deck with 6 fire bolts. Dragons help you beat AI3 faster so I think they are the better choice for beginners and they win a lot faster.

I use the phoenix one in pvp1 (I am paranoid about LAva Golems) and something based on this http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6167.0.html for T50. (I repalced the shards with a fire shield and a rain of fire and added pillars)
The Dragon deck is better for beginners because it is good agaisnt people, T50 AND is fast at AI3
It is also a matter of preference

[ayoth]

Code: [Select]

5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f4 5f4 5f4 5f5 5f6 5f6 5f7 5f8
A pretty minimalist fire deck.  Very offense oriented.  The primary strategy is to get as many crimson dragons out as possible, but another useful way to win is gathering lots of fire quanta and using Fahrenheit + fire bolt for heavy damage.  Rain of fire and deflagrations deal with pesky creatures and permanents.  All non-upgraded cards, so it's cheap.  Beats lvl 3s without fail, and overpowers most non-rainbow non-upgraded pvp decks.  Feedback?

Whenever I use crimson/ruby dragons, I always change my mark to earth and get a few armors. Would that be fine in this deck?

[Toimu13]

What about an upped version?