Burning Pheonix: Reinventing the Golem Rush

[WakSkylicker]

by WakSkylicker

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7di 7di 7di 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 8pm

Added new stats (still more coming):
100 games played, ttw: 5.222, 99 wins, 1 loss, 2 EMs
Game count:

Turns	Wins
4	15
5	55
6	22
7	6
8	1 (fire shield  )

[manaboy100]

I like unupped dragons better, they've bigger HP, they would survive lower level CC, and oh, too many excess quanta

[WakSkylicker]

I like unupped dragons better, they've bigger HP, they would survive lower level CC, and oh, too many excess quanta

Having excess quanta isn't really a problem. You're going to need the quanta very early to fuel the early hitters so the towers start to lose power as the game drags on.

[manaboy100]

2 HP making them more vunerable to CC

[hrmmm]

looks like a fast rush aswell

i usually prefere crimson dragons over ruby dragons.
its not about cc, the 1hp more isnt a big deal.
its about get them out as early as you can. -> -2 quanta can make the difference to play it 1 turn earlyer.

...
In 10 games against lvl 3s, this deck has a 5.1 average ttw.
...

10 games is not even near to a realistic statement about ttw speed

[jmdt]

10 games is not even near to a realistic statement about ttw speed

Yeah, you need atleast 100 games to be statistically signifigant.  I like 200 just to know its leveled off.

[WakSkylicker]

10 games is not even near to a realistic statement about ttw speed

Yeah, you need atleast 100 games to be statistically signifigant.  I like 200 just to know its leveled off.

After a long long long long long time, finally got up to 100 games and I'm too lazy to reach 200... and a new name 

[scottish]

Compare with Lava Rush This deck has a disadvantage: slow. You cannot (perhaps) play LD in fist turn so they are very vulnerablity agains damages, otugh whatever. And if you cannot deal with opponent any usable shield will stop you.

Anyway it is good deck but it miss some deflag. And sure Crimson Dragon is better

[TheIdioticIdiot]

i think getting rid of one tower and trade for a farenheit is a good idea...

[Calindu]

i think getting rid of one tower and trade for a farenheit is a good idea...

Good?It's Very good,1 explosion can be good too.

[aqwsz0]

like so... 1/3 cards are pillars...

[omegareaper7]

like so... 1/3 cards are pillars...

So ? are you trying to say it shouldn't be? Look at the cost of creatures.