Untouchable

[bliblablu]

Untouchable has 2 copies of each of the following cards:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6ru 6ru 6ru 6ru 6ru 6ru 6qq 6qq 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 745 745 745 745 745 745 74c 80h 80h 80h 8pu

Pretty simple, Pretty annoying.

[Edit]
Changed 2 Gravity Tower to 2 Quantum Tower.

[furballdn]

SoVs to counter SoSac? Paying for something that costs 3 in a duo deck isn't that good, and without a mark, it only does 2 permenant damage per turn, which doesn't even matter that much since the chargers would have already done more.

[kimham8a]

Pretty much exactly what furballdn said. 

[Rutarete]

Paying for something that costs 3 in a duo deck isn't that good,

So, having most of the shards in a duo deck is bad? SoR, SoP, etc. They all have their purposes. If blib wants it in, it's meant to be in this deck.

[furballdn]

Paying for something that costs 3 in a duo deck isn't that good,

So, having most of the shards in a duo deck is bad? SoR, SoP, etc. They all have their purposes. If blib wants it in, it's meant to be in this deck.

Just because it's in here doesn't mean it synergizes at all. I could add SoP to divine glory if I wanted, but that wouldn't be a very good addition would it?

[Rutarete]

Paying for something that costs 3 in a duo deck isn't that good,

So, having most of the shards in a duo deck is bad? SoR, SoP, etc. They all have their purposes. If blib wants it in, it's meant to be in this deck.

Just because it's in here doesn't mean it synergizes at all. I could add SoP to divine glory if I wanted, but that wouldn't be a very good addition would it?

It doesn't have to synergize to work. As to that being a good addition, if the AI was a little better, it would be a good addition.

[furballdn]

Paying for something that costs 3 in a duo deck isn't that good,

So, having most of the shards in a duo deck is bad? SoR, SoP, etc. They all have their purposes. If blib wants it in, it's meant to be in this deck.

Just because it's in here doesn't mean it synergizes at all. I could add SoP to divine glory if I wanted, but that wouldn't be a very good addition would it?

It doesn't have to synergize to work. As to that being a good addition, if the AI was a little better, it would be a good addition.

Oh that's good to know then. Here, I made this FG idea. It's name is hidden flames since it concentrates on hiding its precious dragons with cloaks. It also has shards that are there for "their purposes" and because I put it in, it's meant to be in this deck. Who needs synergy anyway right? It would be a lot better if AI was better though.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6rm 6rm 6rm 6rt 6rt 6rv 6rv 6rv 6rv 6rv 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7di 7di 7di 7di 7di 7di 7ti 7ti 7ti 7ti 8pt

[Rutarete]

Are you done being sarcastic?

[Arum]

I sense le troll war. Let it commence!

BTW, you're both right. SoV is kinda redundant because there is no technical synergy or thematics, unless the OP elaborates. Shards are meant to be thrown in any kind of deck, as Rutate said, but are better geared towards certain decks.

Meanwhile, Furball's deck idea is actually thematic. Sacrifice, to be near burning flame and be in constant pain to rush opponents with quick burns and long, drawn-out agony. Divinity, as fire burns away the impure, and gives off light to see by. SoP because fanning the flames requires patience, peace of mind and heart, and more patience.

Now, if we take that into account, let's take a look at the deck. Aether quintessence splash with SoV and somewhat standardized gravity rush.

Gravity binds everything together, placing you under burdens of mental stress. Aether's quintessence to break the pain, to allow freedom, even if it means being trapped in limbo, and void, to wash all the pain and sorrow away, complete peace at heart and mind.

So, there you go guys, ta-da.

[Drake_XIV]

Honey Badgers of the Void.  What I thought when I saw this.  This is quite simplistic, but I don't really see how this is a good idea, to be honest...  I guess the theme is that none of these damages can really be messed with?  Hence Untouchable?

[bliblablu]

Honey Badgers of the Void.  What I thought when I saw this.  This is quite simplistic, but I don't really see how this is a good idea, to be honest...  I guess the theme is that none of these damages can really be messed with?  Hence Untouchable?

Yes. When you apply Momentum&Quintessence to the monster, there's NO way to check the monster, so I named this deck "Untouchable".