Decks Used Against Arena with Stats 1.32

[dark ripper]

Brave Wyrms vs Gold

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mu 7mu 7mu 7mu 7mu 7n9 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 8po

WR: 64%
W: 32
L: 18
EM: 2/50
TTW: 6.16

Those are some stats;p Thanks for seeing the deck, I will try your version vs gold to see how it goes myself!

[jd_k]

More tests against silver, where this deck seems to shine best.

Brave Wyrms vs Silver

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mu 7mu 7mu 7mu 7mu 7n9 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 8po

WR: 92%
W: 46
L: 4
EM: 6/50
TTW: 6.22

The EM rate and TTW were helped out by 4 matches against 1hp decks.


EDIT:
============

Another 50 rounds down.

Brave Wyrms vs Silver
WR: 88%
W: 44
L: 6
EM: 3/50
TTW: 6.25

Not as good this time around.

[jd_k]

Brave Wyrms vs Gold

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mu 7mu 7mu 7mu 7mu 7n9 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 8po

WR: 54%
W: 27
L: 23
EM: 1/50
TTW: 6.63

The EM was against the only 1hp deck I faced. I did the first half of the matches before the weekend and had a win rate more like the previous results, but I guess the metagame was not as friendly to the deck today.

[jd_k]

Figured I would try Platinum. It did better than I anticipated; I would not be surprised if more tests resulted in a lower winrate. Only a single 1hp match, though -- the other EM was against a healing-oriented deck.

Brave Wyrms vs Platinum

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mu 7mu 7mu 7mu 7mu 7n9 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 7nq 8po

WR: 42%
W: 21
L: 29
EM: 2/50
TTW: 7.19

[rob77dp]

-snip-

Reality Rift

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vd 4vf 4vf 4vl 4vn 4vn 4vn 4vn 58r 58r 58r 58s 593 593 593 593 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 8pj

Reality Rift Stats: Bronze
-snip out Keo's stats-

My stats (I hope someday to get this up to min. 50 games):
Against Bronze:
Win: 35
Loss: 15
EM: 3
Total turns: 724
SS: 2

This was easily the least enjoyable 21 50 Bronze matches I have ever slogged through.  I really have no idea how Keo managed 38W 12L with it.  No PC means MA is auto-loss.  Limited and soft-only CC means things like Pharaoh-scarab spam and FFQ's are deadly.  Growth decks with some healing and/or CC are trouble too.  Bascially, 40% of that commonly found in Bronze destroys this thing.  Stay away unless you have a strong urge for pain and frustration OR are hoping to post enough tests in groups of min. 50 to get this off the top-rated Bronze grinders. 

Edit:  I have now completed the required 50 matches minimum to get included in the study.  I'll never use this deck again - nothing personal against its creator.  I just cannot stand the lack of PC, SLOW starting, and general weakness to the more common Bronze decks.  UGH!  It is my sincere hope these results drop this off the "spoiler" level of decks in the OP... ... ... :/

[Keolino]

This was easily the least enjoyable 21 Bronze matches I have ever slogged through.  I really have no idea how Keo managed 38W 12L with it.  No PC means MA is auto-loss.  Limited and soft-only CC means things like Pharaoh-scarab spam and FFQ's are deadly.  Growth decks with some healing and/or CC are trouble too.  Bascially, 40% of that commonly found in Bronze destroys this thing.  Stay away unless you have a strong urge for pain and frustration OR are hoping to post enough tests in groups of min. 50 to get this off the top-rated Bronze grinders. 

Don't worry I didn't enjoy playing with this deck either It takes many turns to win, and even after 12 turns you sometimes don't know if you will win or not/if you can quit the game or not. Further, you have to think a lot what to play at each point of the game (since you don't have much quanta and excess cards which you have to choose from) and know exactly how the opponent's AI works, which makes each turn cost a lot of seconds. And even 1 HP decks need 5-6 turns if you don't get lucky enough for the discord I definitely wouldn't recommend this deck to anyone other than people who want a hard challenge once in a while.

Anyway:
1. Against mono aether, I didn't even once autoquit, and with luck in drawing earthquakes as well as antimattering Psions I won some (not even half though) games against aethers. Main strategy would be stalling his quanta till he runs out of shields.
2. Against Firefly queen, it's 50/50. If he has owl's eyes and shockwaves and you antimatter his Queens, he will attack them first before your dragons.
3. Against Pharao-Scarab, I can only say that you are right. But there aren't many of them in Bronze though. (Well they need a lot of time quanta, so the quanta stall is still effective, and with stone dragons you still have a chance, at least)

Another random fact: It isn't number 5 anymore. Once Colorless Green updates again, it is at max. number 8, because Mono Entropy bronze and Queens of the Bronze Age (both from colorless green) as well as It's a Trap! are above it.

[jd_k]

Speed Poison Kamikaze vs Gold

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 711 711 718 718 718 718 718 718 71a 71a 71u 71u 71u 71u 71u 71u 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 7ee 8po

WR: 46%
W: 23
L: 27
EM: 6/50
TTW: 9.52

Winrate was a bit higher than I expected, and EM rate was a bit lower.

[rob77dp]

Bump - I finished the 50 games on Reality Rift.  See here

[valiance]

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/rainbow-decks/wingsbow-(gold)(pvp2)/msg1122966/#msg1122966

My version of wingsbow for Gold.

Total Games	100
Average TTW	9.57377
Wins	61
Win rate	0.61
EM	5
EM rate	0.0820
UEI	7889.30
SSPH	3.98

[rob77dp]

-snip-

Spoiler for Reality Rift deck code:

Reality Rift

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vd 4vf 4vf 4vl 4vn 4vn 4vn 4vn 58r 58r 58r 58s 593 593 593 593 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 8pj

Reality Rift Stats: Bronze
-snip out Keo's stats-

My results(I hope someday to get this up to min. 50 games):
Win: 35
Loss: 15
EM: 3
TTW: 14.29
SS: 2

This was easily the least enjoyable 21 50 Bronze matches I have ever slogged through.  I really have no idea how Keo managed 38W 12L with it.  No PC means MA is auto-loss.  Limited and soft-only CC means things like Pharaoh-scarab spam and FFQ's are deadly.  Growth decks with some healing and/or CC are trouble too.  Bascially, 40% of that commonly found in Bronze destroys this thing.  Stay away unless you have a strong urge for pain and frustration OR are hoping to post enough tests in groups of min. 50 to get this off the top-rated Bronze grinders. 

Edit:  I have now completed the required 50 matches minimum to get included in the study.  I'll never use this deck again - nothing personal against its creator.  I just cannot stand the lack of PC, SLOW starting, and general weakness to the more common Bronze decks.  UGH!  It is my sincere hope these results drop this off the "spoiler" level of decks in the OP... ... ... :/

Edits to my previous post indicated here in yellow.  Special attention to the TTW instead of total turns to play.

[rob77dp]

*A WILD Double-Post appears!*

Excuse the double-post, please. 

I finished a min-50 game run I began 8 months ago. 

I started it here and finished it now.  Summary of stats as follows:

Against Bronze:
Wins: 37
Loss: 15
EM: 1
TTW: 8.27
SS: 4

Spoiler for Super Stalkers used for the stats:

Thread for deck...

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6u2 6u2 6u2 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 71e 71e 71e 71e 71e 71e 74a 74a 74a 7an 7an 7an 7an 7an 7tb 7tb 8pn

I think the longest game - win or lose - was 11 turns so this is definitely speedy to play.

[ColorlessGreen]

OP updated with all valid tests through this post.

Additionally, due to an update to the UEI formula, all UEI values in the OP have been updated, and are hopefully much more accurate now.

As a side note, this study includes 12223 games spread across 115 different entries.