Not entirely familiar on Statmasta or how you guys generally do the tests, but why there's not a single EM using SPlat? Also, I'm wondering if the Statmasta is capable of calculating the profit using a deck with >100HP EM (e.g. SPlat)?
No, considering the actual ingame-values it can't.
EM is defined as: 100HP = 120 electrum = 120 score
Wups. Yeah, i put priority on money won rather than score. Hence, more than 100hp ems put in normal column.
Hehehe, yes you can do that and
all the money-stats will work just fine.
The downsides are:
-
All the score-stats will show up higher than they actually were ingame
-> They would be up to 20% lower
for each individual EM played-> E.g., if your overall EM-rate was 50%, all your scorestats should be up to 10% lower
- The "HPs left"-column on the third sheet gets completely screwed over
-> The statmasta will assume all that electrum entered in Input-column 5 is coming from awesomely high HPs left
(e.g. If you enter a regular 100HP-EM as 120 electrum in the no-EM-column, the statmasta will think you won with 350HPs left ...)
-> There is no telling what you actually played. Then again, it's just a funky sidestat anyways ...
Now I don't really remember the ingame-values for EMs > 100HP ...
100HP gives you 120score, 200HP gives you what? ... 160 score?
Instosish.
deck | Instosis |
players | Jenkar |
Statmasta™4000 *assumed card-spin/win: 35%
score/h | FGei(c) | Statmasta™4000 | wins | losses | skips | EM/Wins |
1000 294 -295 752 1536 928 -386 1940 320 1507 1605 1577 960 344 -717 1105 -800 1522 1575 128 1312 447 73 1671 1600 -359 575 1200 1296 | 7714 4041 2872 5917 8837 6924 1506 10478 4701 9291 9643 9745 6580 4477 525 7699 -800 8710 9415 3941 8166 5078 3527 9346 9508 1063 5421 7846 8568 | Akebono Chaos Lord Dark Matter Decay Destiny Divine Glory Dream Catcher Elidnis Eternal Phoenix Ferox Fire Queen Gemini Graviton Hecate Hermes Incarnate Jezebel Lionheart Miracle Morte Neptune Obliterator Octane Osiris Paradox Rainbow Scorpio Seism Serket | 5 4 2 6 10 8 3 10 2 10 10 7 8 4 1 7 10 11 3 6 3 1 8 12 1 7 9 7 | 3 6 7 10 5 15 3 1 3 5 10 3 8 2 6 1 4 2 6 7 1 2 | | 4 1 1 1 |
http://www.mediafire.com/?lm3vd0574awopi4
With the skip procedure :
deck | Instosis |
players | Jenkar |
Statmasta™4000 *assumed card-spin/win: 35%
score/h | FGei(c) | Statmasta™4000 | wins | losses | skips | EM/Wins |
1000 -108000 -108000 752 1536 928 -108000 1940 320 1507 1605 1577 960 344 -108000 1105 -108000 1522 1575 128 1312 447 73 1671 1600 -108000 575 1200 1296 | 7714 -108000 -108000 5917 8837 6924 -108000 10478 4701 9291 9643 9745 6580 4477 -108000 7699 -108000 8710 9415 3941 8166 5078 3527 9346 9508 -108000 5421 7846 8568 | Akebono Chaos Lord Dark Matter Decay Destiny Divine Glory Dream Catcher Elidnis Eternal Phoenix Ferox Fire Queen Gemini Graviton Hecate Hermes Incarnate Jezebel Lionheart Miracle Morte Neptune Obliterator Octane Osiris Paradox Rainbow Scorpio Seism Serket | 5 6 10 8 10 2 10 10 7 8 4 7 10 11 3 6 3 1 8 12 7 9 7 | 3 10 5 3 1 3 5 3 2 6 1 4 2 7 1 2 | 10 9 18 11 8 7 | 4 1 1 1 |
Jenkar, you were using the 4000-edition for this?
I'd recommend transferring the data to the
realistic realtec-edition ... The difference will be vast!
But i am little confused. On gods that we are both undefeated against say Destiny, Gemini, Lionheart. On the stats i have they generally say over 12k, but on yours they say ~8-9k. We have pretty much the same average game time length, what do you think the difference is?
The difference is:
Sevs = realtec = up to date and shiny happy
Jenkar = 4000 = outdated and dull
Keep in mind, that 4000 assumes a card-spin-rate of 35% for each FG whereas realtec has the realistic spin-rates broken down for each god individually ... With a deck like this, which plays well against cashcows such as DG (68%), Akebono (59%), even EternalPh (56%), this makes an especially huge difference!