I did my best to post popular decks in forms that were accepted as optimal as determined through my own experiences and from speaking with other veteran players. If I am off by a card or two in the whole thing, people who did not organize the study themselves or speak up earlier will have to live with it. There will be a phase (hopefully soon), after we've gathered enough data on the initial decks, for testing variants.
Even in reference to Turbo, it would be hard to argue that a deck without SoG's is going to outperform one with a couple of utility SoG's. I assumed that was common sense, hence the change there. Also, switching to a pend/pillar split was assumed common sense.
The 5 vs. 6 fractal debate is not a hard and fast one, and I prefer to let the numbers decide in the long run. Sure, for things like fractix 4 or 5 is optimal, where filling the field is your ultimate goal, but for RoL/Hope's which need to fight CC and fuel their hope asap, 6 is in the picture. I will let the numbers tell the interesting story.
In fact, can you edit away that link and repost it when you
hit those 300?
I think Oni was joking about the 300 part.... at least I hope for his sake he hits Neptune sooner than that. Unless.... he just loves RoL/Hope THAT much. The preliminary numbers certainly would support his love of the deck if he just feels like doing 300 for the money.